Popular Democracy in Japan examines a puzzle in Japanese politics: Why do Japanese women turn out to vote at rates higher than men? On the basis of in-depth fieldwork in various parts of the country, Sherry L. Martin argues that the exclusion of women from a full range of opportunities in public life provokes many of them to seek alternative outlets for self-expression. They have options that include a wide variety of study, hobby, and lifelong learning groups-a feature of Japanese civic life that the Ministry of Education encourages.Women who participate in these alternative spaces for learning tend, Martin finds, to examine the political conditions that have pushed them there. Her research suggests that study group participation increases women's confidence in using various types of political participation (including voting) to pressure political elites for a more inclusive form of democracy. Considerable overlap between the narratives that emerge from women's groups and a survey of national public opinion identifies these groups as crucial sites for crafting and circulating public discourses about politics. Martin shows how the interplay between public opinion and institutional change has given rise to bottom-up changes in electoral politics that culminated in the 2009 Democratic Party of Japan victory in the House of Representatives election.
Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,7500€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.
Extrait
Popular Democracy in Japan
Popular Democracy in Japan
How Gender and Community Are Changing Modern Electoral Politics
Sherry L. Martin
Cornell University Press Ithaca and London
This book has been published with the aid of a grant from the Hull Memorial Publication Fund of Cornell University.
All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850.
First published 2011 by Cornell University Press Printed in the United States of America
Library of Congress CataloginginPublication Data
Martin, Sherry L., 1971– Popular democracy in Japan : how gender and community are changing modern electoral politics / Sherry L. Martin. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 9780801449178 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Democracy—Japan. 2. Japan—Politics and government— 21st century. 3. Political participation—Japan. 4. Political culture— Japan. 5. Women—Political activity—Japan. 6. Community power—Japan. I. Title. JQ1681.M3 2011 320.952—dc22 2010044421
Cornell University Press strives to use environmentally responsible suppliers and materials to the fullest extent possible in the publishing of its books. Such materials include vegetablebased, lowVOC inks and acidfree papers that are recycled, totally chlorinefree, or partly composed of nonwood fibers. For further information, visit our website at www. cornellpress.cornell.edu.
Cloth printing
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
For my extraordinary working mom. . .
Tables and Figures
Acknowledgments
Abbreviations
Contents
Introduction: Why Don’t They Stay Home?
1. The Political Distance between Citizens and Elites
2. New Styles of Political Leadership and Community Mobilization
3. National Attitudes and Local Action: Changing the Center from the Periphery
4. Politically Excluded “Commoners”: A Gendered Pathway to Participation
5. Gender and “Communities of Practice”: Escaping the Regulatory Boundaries of Formal Education
ix xi xv
1 26
49
73
102
130
v i i i C o n t e n t s
Conclusion: Engendering Knowledge and Political Action
References Index
159
175 187
Tables and Figures
Tables i.1 Trends in gender and voter turnout in national elections, 1946–2009 i.2 Trends in gender and voter turnout in subnational elections, 1975–2007 i.3 Focus group sampling 5.1 Tapping into the “official” lifelong learning universe, 2005 5.2 Change in gender and rates of study group participation between 1986 and 2006
Figures i.1 Gender and nonpartisanship, 1976–2005
1.1 Sampling discontent
5.1 Gender gap in higher educational attainment, 1955–2005