In The End of Grand Strategy, Simon Reich and Peter Dombrowski challenge the common view of grand strategy as unitary. They eschew prescription of any one specific approach, chosen from a spectrum that stretches from global primacy to restraint and isolationism, in favor of describing what America's military actually does, day to day. They argue that a series of fundamental recent changes in the global system, the inevitable jostling of bureaucratic politics, and the practical limitations of field operations combine to ensure that each presidential administration inevitably resorts to a variety of strategies. Proponents of different American grand strategies have historically focused on the pivotal role of the Navy. In response, Reich and Dombrowski examine six major maritime operations, each of which reflects one major strategy. One size does not fit all, say the authors-the attempt to impose a single overarching blueprint is no longer feasible. Reich and Dombrowski declare that grand strategy, as we know it, is dead. The End of Grand Strategy is essential reading for policymakers, military strategists, and analysts and critics at advocacy groups and think tanks.
Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,7500€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.
Extrait
TheEndofGrandStrategy
TheEndofGrand Strategy
USMaritimeOperationsinthe Twenty-First Century
S i m o n R e i c h a n d P e t e r D o m b r o w s k i
All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book,
or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without
permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address
Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca,
New York 14850.
First published 2017 by Cornell University Press
Printed in the United States of America
Library of Congress CataloginginPublication Data
Names: Reich, Simon, 1959– author. | Dombrowski, Peter J., 1963– author. Title: The end of grand strategy : US maritime operations in the twentyfirst century / Simon Reich and Peter Dombrowski. Description: Ithaca : Cornell University Press, 2017. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017028025 (print) | LCCN 2017032106 (ebook) | ISBN 9781501714634 (epub/mobi) | ISBN 9781501714641 (pdf) | ISBN 9781501714627 (cloth : alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Seapower—United States—History—21st century. | Military doctrine—United States—History—21st century. | Naval strategy—History—21st century. | United States—History, Naval—21st century. Classification: LCC VA50 (ebook) | LCC VA50 .R45 2017 (print) | DDC 359/.030973—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017028025
suppliers and materials to the fullest extent possible in the publishing
of its books. Such materials include vegetablebased, lowVOC inks
and acidfree papers that are recycled, totally chlorinefree, or partly
composed of nonwood fibers. For further information, visit our
website at cornellpress.cornell.edu.
Cover design by David Baldeosingh Rotstein
ForACDAandAMM,whomadethiswork,and make our lives, so rewarding
Contents
PrefaceandAcknowledgments
Introduction: Grand Strategies and Everyday Conflicts1.Operations and Grand Strategy in a Naval New Security Environment2. Comparing Grand Strategies—and Their Inherent Limitations3. A Maritime Strategy of Primacy in the Persian Gulf4. Playing a FollowtheLeader Strategy on the High Seas5.Terrorists, and Formal Sponsorship Pirates, 6. Navigating the Proliferation Security Initiative and Informal Sponsorship7.for the Arctic with a Strategy of Restraint Racing 8. Controlling the Southern Maritime Approaches with an Isolationist Strategy
Conclusion:MovingbeyondtheCurrentDebate
vii
ix
1
13
28 47 66 85
103 122
142 161
CONTENTS
Appendixes
1.TheStrategiesofAmericanForeignPolicy2.SelectMultilateralExercisesintheIndo-Pacific3.PSIMultinationalExercisesNotes Index
viii
179 181 183 185 189 235
PrefaceandAcknowledgments
Intheopeningmonthsof2017,Americaisintheprocessofadramaticpresidential transition. Many commentators are already anticipating dras tic foreign policy changes as well as a general sense of administrative incoherence. As evidence, they point to the wide differences between the pronouncements of President Trump and the comments made in their confirmation hearings by many of those he nominated for senior foreign policy positions. Indeed, inForeign Policyin January 2017, Micah Zenko and Rebecca Friedman Lissner pronounced that Trump had no grand strategy, before he was even sworn in as president. Clearly,theappointmentofmilitaryofficialstoseniorpolicymakingpo sitions suggests a tone and approach different from the Obama administra tion’s. As we argue in this book, military personnel generally lack faith in the virtues of any grand strategy. They are pragmatic problem solvers, more comfortable with a response to specific problems than a recourse to abstract principles. That point was tellingly illustrated in James Mattis’s congressional confirmation hearing for the post of Defense Secretary. When Mattis was asked about Russia he responded, “I’m all for engagement, but we also have to recognize reality and what Russia is up to. . . . There’s a decreasing number of areas where we can engage cooperatively and an in creasing number of areas where we’re going to have to confront Russia." Circumstances outweighed principle in language, policy, and practice. Inthisbook,wearguethatZenkoandLissner’scommentsabouttheTrump presidency are unwittingly symptomatic of a larger trend: that the link between values and “ways, means and ends” defies the deductive for mulations about grand strategies debated by academics and formulated by policymakers. We can look back nostalgically at American grand strategy