Archaeology of the Caddo
535 pages
English

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris

Archaeology of the Caddo , livre ebook

-

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus
535 pages
English
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus

Description

This landmark volume provides the most comprehensive overview to date of the prehistory and archaeology of the Caddo peoples. The Caddos lived in the Southeastern Woodlands for more than 900 years beginning around AD 800–900, before being forced to relocate to Oklahoma in 1859. They left behind a spectacular archaeological record, including the famous Spiro Mound site in Oklahoma as well as many other mound centers, plazas, farmsteads, villages, and cemeteries.

The Archaeology of the Caddo examines new advances in studying the history of the Caddo peoples, including ceramic analysis, reconstructions of settlement and regional histories of different Caddo communities, Geographic Information Systems and geophysical landscape studies at several spatial scales, the cosmological significance of mound and structure placements, and better ways to understand mortuary practices. Findings from major sites and drainages such as the Crenshaw site, mounds in the Arkansas River basin, Spiro Mound, the Oak Hill Village site, the George C. Davis site, the Willow Chute Bayou Locality, the Hughes site, Big Cypress Creek basin, and the McClelland and Joe Clark sites are also summarized and interpreted. This volume reintroduces the Caddos’ heritage, creativity, and political and religious complexity.

Sujets

Informations

Publié par
Date de parution 01 juin 2012
Nombre de lectures 0
EAN13 9780803240469
Langue English
Poids de l'ouvrage 9 Mo

Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,2700€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.

Extrait

The Archaeology of the Caddo
The Archaeology of the Caddo
Edited by Timothy K. Perttula and Chester P. Walker
University of Nebraska Press Lincoln and London
© 2012 by the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America
Chapter 8, “The Evolution of a Caddo Community in Northeastern Texas,” by Timothy K. Perttula and Robert Rogers, was originally published inAmerican AntiquityIt has been slightly72.1 (2007): 71–94. modified to conform with the editorial guidelines followed for the volume.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The archaeology of the Caddo / edited by Timothy K. Perttula and Chester P. Walker. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn978-0-8032-2096-6 (pbk.: alk. paper) 1. Caddo Indians—History. 2. Caddo Indians— Antiquities. 3. Caddo Indians—Social life and customs. 4. Excavations (Archaeology— Great Plains). 5. Great Plains—Antiquities. I. Perttula, Timothy K. II. Walker, Chester P. e99.c12a73 2012 976'.01—dc23 2011052083
Set in Quadraat and Quadraat Sans. Designed by A. Shahan.
Contents
List of Figures List of Tables Foreword
1. The Archaeology of the Caddo in Southwest Arkansas,  Northwest Louisiana, Eastern Oklahoma, and  East Texas: An Introduction to the Volume  timo th y k . perttula
2. Form and Structure in Prehistoric Caddo Pottery Design ea rly a n n m .
3. At the House of the Priest: Faunal Remains from the  Crenshaw Site (3MI6), Southwest Arkansas  h . ed win j a c kson , susa n l . sc o tt,  a n d fr a n k f. sc ha m b a ch
4. Bioarchaeological Evidence of Subsistence Strategies  among the East Texas Caddo  d ia n e wi lson
5. Spiro Reconsidered: Sacred Economy at the Western  Frontier of the Eastern Woodlands  j a mes a . b rown
6. Viewshed Characteristics of Caddo Mounds in the  Arkansas Basin  g regory vogel
7. Exploring Prehistoric Caddo Communities through  Archaeogeophysics  c hester p. wa l ker a nd d un c a n p. mc ki nn on
vii xiii xv
2
1
6
4
7
86
117
139
177
8. The Evolution of a Caddo Community in  Northeast Texas  timo th y k . perttula a nd r ob er t r og er s
9. Settlement Patterns and Variation in Caddo Pottery  Decoration: A Case Study of the Willow Chute  Bayou Locality  j eff rey s. g ir a r d
10. Caddo in the Saline River Valley of Arkansas: The  Borderlands Project and the Hughes Site  m a ry b eth tr ub itt
11. Spatial Patterns of Caddo Mound Sites in the West  Gulf Coastal Plain of Arkansas  j a mi j. lockha r t
12. Decisions in Landscape Setting Selection of the  Prehistoric Caddo of Southeastern Oklahoma:  AgisAnalysis  r ob ert l . b r ooks
13. The Character of Fifteenth- to Seventeenth-Century  Caddo Communities in the Big Cypress Creek Basin  of Northeast Texas  timo th y k . perttula
14. The Belcher Phase: Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century  Caddo Occupation of the Red River Valley in Northwest  Louisiana and Southwest Arkansas  d a vi d b . kelley
15. The Terán Map and Caddo Cosmology  g eorge sa b o i i i
 References Cited  Contributors  Index
209
239
288
313
335
363
411
431
449 499 501
Figures
 1-1. Distribution of the main Mississippian period groups in eastern  North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3  1-2. Sites and areas mentioned in the text in the Southern and  Northern Caddo areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6  1-3. The geographic extent within the Southern and Northern  Caddo areas discussed by contributors in this book . . . . . . . . 15  1-4. Looking south-southwest at the Battle mound site in  southwest Arkansas in 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23  2-1. Map of Arkansas showing the area where the sample of  Friendship Engraved,var. Freemanvessels used in this study  came from, and the 1938–1950 collecting area of the  Henderson State University Museum and Hodges pottery  collections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31  2-2. Friendship Engraved,var. Freemancarinated bowl, showing  scribing lines laying out the design fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33  2-3. The first three steps in decoration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34  2-4. The design choices found in the study sample . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35  2-5. Finishing stages and options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38  2-6. Final decorative choices available for the oval-within-an- oval design option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39  2-7. Examples of “nongrammatical” vessels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41  2-8. Friendship Engraved,var. Meadorbowl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42  2-9. Examples of stacked or fused vessels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45  3-1. Location of the Crenshaw site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51  3-2. The Crenshaw site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52  3-3. Simplified plan view of the 1969 and 1983 Arkansas  Archeological Survey Excavations at Crenshaw . . . . . . . . . . . . 53  3-4. Size distribution of fish remains from Crenshaw,  distributed according to family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70  3-5. Deer anatomical distribution in structure and midden fan  samples, grouped by food utility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
 3-6. Comparison of percentnispof faunal assemblages from  Crenshaw and four Caddo sites in the Red River region . . . . . 77  3-7. Comparison ofmniof faunal assemblages from Crenshaw  and four Caddo sites in the Red River region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78  3-8. Comparison of relative bone weight contributions by family  to the Crenshaw and McLelland faunal assemblages . . . . . . . . 79 13 15  4-1. The relationship between apatite delta C and delta N  collagen values through time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 13 15  4-2. The relationship between apatite delta C and delta N  collagen values through time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105  5-1. The Craig mound from the northwest during the winter  of 1913–1914 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118  5-2. The Great Mortuary floor showing the approximate location  of the major cult figures and other furniture recovered by the  relic hunters among the litter burial constructions and other  features uncovered by thewpa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129  6-1. Relief map showing locations of sites employed in this  study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141  6-2. Viewshed size from the ground surface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153  6-3. Viewshed size from mound summits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154  6-4. Gain in mound viewsheds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155  6-5. Mound viewsheds plotted by echelon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157  6-6. Mound viewsheds ranked against the statistical background  of 99 generated samples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162  6-7. Relief map showing viewshed from the summit of Brown  mound at Spiro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163  6-8. Relief map showing viewshed from the Craig mound at  Spiro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163  6-9. Relief map showing viewshed from the Cavanaugh  mound . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164  6-10. Topographic cross-section across the Poteau/Arkansas  bottoms, with mound base and summit elevations . . . . . . . . 168  6-11. Relief map showing viewsheds from Mound I–II at Norman,  Mound Unit 7 at Harlan, and Fort Davis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170  6-12. View from the bottoms approximately 2 km north of Ewing  Chapel Cemetery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172  7-1. The magnetometer survey areas at the George C. Davis  site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182
 7-2. Interpretive map showing the architectural features iden- tified in the magnetometer surveys and past archeological  excavations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184  7-3. Examples of button houses at the George C. Davis site . . . . . 185  7-4. The excavated and geophysical architectural features from  the George C. Davis site, including the structures excavated  under Mound A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187  7-5. Locations of possible plazas and community spaces at  the George C. Davis site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188  7-6. The location of Area A and Area B at the Hill Farm site,  channel lakes of the Red River, and an ancient abandoned  stream channel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190  7-7. Plan of Area A collection blocks and interpretation of the  geophysical data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192  7-8. Plan of Area B collection blocks and interpretation of the  geophysical data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193  7-9. Detail of the western portion of the 1691 Terán map showing  the old abandoned channel of the Red River and the house- hold compounds that may represent the likely area of the Hill  Farm site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195  7-10. Total coverage of the magnetic gradiometry survey at the  Battle site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197  7-11. Clusters of possible structures, a community cemetery, a  potential compound fence, a borrow pit, and a possible  linear causeway identified in the Battle site archaeogeo- physical data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198  7-12. House 6 at the Belcher site compared with a small circular  structure with a possible extended entranceway identified in  the Battle site data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199  7-13. A complex grouping of high magnetic values forms a  possible farmstead with a compound fence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200  7-14. Numerous circular structures located on two rises east of  the large mound . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202  7-15. Structure 1 at the McLelland site compared with two  large circular structures identified in the Battle mound  site data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204  7-16. Structure at the Werner site compared with the several  concentric circular patterns identified in the Battle mound  site data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
  • Univers Univers
  • Ebooks Ebooks
  • Livres audio Livres audio
  • Presse Presse
  • Podcasts Podcasts
  • BD BD
  • Documents Documents