Summary of James Gordon & Rebecca Doll's Mastering Erotic Hypnosis , livre ebook

Everest Media LLC - Everest Media

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris

Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus

78 pages

English

Vous pourrez modifier la taille du texte de cet ouvrage

Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus

A propos
Informations
Extrait

Description

Please note: This is a companion version & not the original book.
Sample Book Insights:
#1 The classic 19th century experiments conducted by Jules Liégeois of the Nancy school of hypnosis were criticized and repeated by Gilles de la Tourette, who gave a patient a ruler and told her it was a gun.
#2 The Paris School believed that hypnotized subjects could be made to commit crimes while hypnotized, while the Nancy School believed that such an occurrence might be possible.
#3 The idea that people can’t be made to do anything against their will while hypnotized is false. They can be made to do things that are against their will, but not things that are against the law.
#4 The CIA conducted a human experimentation program called MKUltra from 1953 to 1973, which involved the use of hypnosis and other forms of torture. The program was not focused on mind control, but on developing irresistible interrogation techniques.

Sujets

Self-help

Sexual Instruction

Informations

Publié par	Everest Media LLC
Date de parution	11 mai 2022
Nombre de lectures	0
EAN13	9798822505063
Langue	English
Poids de l'ouvrage	1 Mo

Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,0150€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.

Extrait

Insights on James Gordon & Rebecca Doll's Mastering Erotic Hypnosis
Contents Insights from Chapter 1 Insights from Chapter 2 Insights from Chapter 3 Insights from Chapter 4 Insights from Chapter 5 Insights from Chapter 6 Insights from Chapter 7 Insights from Chapter 8 Insights from Chapter 9 Insights from Chapter 10 Insights from Chapter 11 Insights from Chapter 12 Insights from Chapter 13 Insights from Chapter 14 Insights from Chapter 15 Insights from Chapter 16 Insights from Chapter 17 Insights from Chapter 18 Insights from Chapter 19 Insights from Chapter 20
Insights from Chapter 1

#1

The classic 19th century experiments conducted by Jules Liégeois of the Nancy school of hypnosis were criticized and repeated by Gilles de la Tourette, who gave a patient a ruler and told her it was a gun.

#2

The Paris School believed that hypnotized subjects could be made to commit crimes while hypnotized, while the Nancy School believed that such an occurrence might be possible.

#3

The idea that people can’t be made to do anything against their will while hypnotized is false. They can be made to do things that are against their will, but not things that are against the law.

#4

The CIA conducted a human experimentation program called MKUltra from 1953 to 1973, which involved the use of hypnosis and other forms of torture. The program was not focused on mind control, but on developing irresistible interrogation techniques.

#5

It is important to draw a line between behavior and submission. While it is acceptable to ask someone to do something they may not want to do, it is not acceptable to force them to do something they do not want to do.

#6

The law and most kinksters call for ongoing contemporaneous consent. In plain English, this means that the person has to be agreeing to the thing as they do it, and be able to agree to it at the time. If you're like most people, you've done a few things in your life you didn't really want to do.

#7

The Salpêtrière Hospital in Paris was the site of many famous experiments, including the one on Jane Avril, a dancer who was admitted in 1882. She became the subject of a largely fictional novel by Swedish author Per Olov Enquist.

#8

The half-Irish laundress Trilby was hypnotized by the roguish Svengali in George du Maurier’s novel Trilby. This novel popularized the idea of an unscrupulous lover who preys on an innocent girl, offering her one thing through hypnosis, but secretly making her his love slave.

#9

There are many reasons not to be unethical when hypnosis is involved. You will get caught, and the human mind doesn’t support unethical behavior well. The subject who appears to be your hypnotic slave may behave differently when they are out from under your thumb.

#10

There are special ethics considerations if you are considering a career or practice in hypnosis, particularly if you are a therapist. While this is not a part of the ethics of your certifying body, most educational sources encourage hypnotists to share their skills to benefit friends and family.

#11

When you are a hypnotist, you are taking on the role of a top, and your partner is acting as a bottom, even if you don’t use those terms. You must ensure that what happens during a session is what both parties agreed to.

#12

There are two basic approaches to consent: explicit and implicit. Explicit consent is when you and your partner agree on every single thing that will happen during a sexual encounter. Implicit consent is when you and your partner have agreed to let things happen during a sexual encounter, but you don’t have to explicitly say yes to everything that your partner does.

#13

The traditional model is when a man makes a move, and if his partner doesn’t respond, he makes another move. If his partner responds positively, he continues making moves. There is no specific statement of consent, but positive responses imply contemporaneous consent.

#14

The kinky model is when everything is discussed beforehand. In order to maintain contemporaneous consent, a safeword is sometimes used to differentiate between, say, wincing and tears that mean I am in pain.

#15

Safewords are problematic because they make the person who is not in control responsible for establishing consent. They can also make things worse, serving as a goad to shame someone into consenting to more than they originally planned to.

#16

hypnosis requires you to negotiate in advance, which may be awkward or intimidating for people who have not practiced negotiate-as-you-go play. It goes against the mentality of many negotiate-as-you-go play partners who may not decide how far they are willing to go until they get there.

#17

The three standards of consent are trust, respect, and integrity. If you are strong in all three of these areas, you are likely safer. If you feel you are in the maybe zone, or skirting the edge, you are probably acting non-consensually.

#18

It is not the right time to try to get your partner to do something they didn’t already agree to when they are under hypnosis. Most of us want to do a lot of things that we end up not doing because our common sense stops us.

#19

The best way to determine if your partner is still suggestible is to ask questions and observe their responses to day-to-day matters. A clear tone of voice and normal sharp responses to conversation are a good indication that suggestibility is passing, but you should also ask questions.

#20

The Svengali trope is attractive to some players who feel that if they can get a partner into state, they can ask for things they would never be able to ask for in the light of day. Anything of a sexual or intimate nature that is to be a part of a hypnosis scene must be negotiated separately.

#21

It is up to you to consider the possible mental and emotional impacts of any hypnotic suggestion you make. You must obtain consent beforehand if you intend to use imagery or suggestion to produce arousal or orgasm.

#22

When two partners have a longstanding intimate relationship and hypnosis is simply a new addition, it is generally a bad idea to use blanket consent.

#23

Some people are capable of making negotiatory decisions in or immediately after coming out of state. These people are typically indirect suggestibles on the high end of the spectrum. Others are simply very experienced at dealing with hypnotic states.

#24

Some people are motivated by danger or the feeling of being under the control of another person. They may want the Svengali experience, where they feel helpless or taken advantage of. They may want to feel like they are in control of their own bodies but still have powerful sexual experiences without feeling they are in control.

#25

If you intend to implant any other posthypnotic suggestions that would cause specific behavior or memories, make sure you have a clear understanding of limits. While not an exhaustive list, the following three areas should be carefully negotiated: erotica-based suggestions, orgasm triggers, and arousal triggers, particularly in embarrassing out of the bedroom situations.

#26

When creating mental scenes, make sure they are specific and do not go beyond what is safe and consensual. Do not make the person into a mindless doll or robot. Discuss any potential triggers or traumas with the person and how you would handle them if they occurred.

#27

Always discuss any prior history of problems under hypnosis. You'll want to know and talk through how to avoid similar problems in the present. If the issue seems beyond your skill set, you may need to go slowly or learn more before you're ready to play with this partner.

#28

Before beginning any hypnotic scene, you should have answers to all of these questions: How long will the person feel normal and in control of themselves. Have they ever had any issues with remaining in state. If you aren’t their primary partner, who do you contact if they need additional care or support.

#29

The list below is a starting point for negotiation topics. If you don't see the thing you want to do on the list, it probably should be.

#30

Consent to go down on your partner does not imply consent to force yourself on them. Masturbation, oral, genital, and anything else should be discussed separately.
Insights from Chapter 2

#1

Hypnosis is a real, provable, neuroscientific fact. Well-researched and legitimately peer-reviewed sources have agreed on the objective reality of hypnosis for years.

#2

Hypnosis is a state of concentration that can be induced by a hypnotist, and it is often used to help people achieve a variety of mental states. It is important to understand that not all hypnotic states are the same, and that we may want to consider hypnosis as a doorway that can open a variety of different mental states depending on our suggestions.

#3

The traditional view of hypnosis is that it looks like sleepwalking or zombification. In practice, however, this is not always the case. Hypnotized individuals may look like this not because they have to, but because they have seen portrayals of what hypnosis should look like and their unconscious mind acts out those images.

#4

Hypnosis is a state of profound suggestibility to the hypnotist. It is either an altered state of consciousness or a state of profound suggestibility, but not both. Different types of hypnosis and meditation produce different results.

#5

Charcot was a French doctor who was the founder of modern neurology. He was also the first to describe ALS, which was previously known as Lou Gherig’s disease in the United States. His methods may seem flamboyant today, but by the standards of his day, he was a careful scientist.

#6

The Stanford and Harvard Group Scales are typically used to measure hypnosis susceptibility. They suggest three different groups for hypnosis, with l