Better Results Through Learning , livre ebook

eBookIt.com - Michael Dolan

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris

Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus

59 pages

English

Vous pourrez modifier la taille du texte de cet ouvrage

Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus

A propos
Informations
Extrait

Description

"Over the long run, superior performance depends on superior learning."

You need results from a workforce that is knowledgeable, flexible, efficient, and resilient. Are you and your employees continuously learning and transforming yourselves to solve new problems and achieve new goals? Or are you less than satisfied with the learning and performance of your staff? This practical report, researched by a special task force of high-powered executives organized by the US Human Resource Development Council, shows you how to efficiently achieve the people results you wish you had last week.

Sujets

Economics

Business

Informations

Publié par	eBookIt.com
Date de parution	19 novembre 2013
Nombre de lectures	0
EAN13	9780971018259
Langue	English

Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,0250€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.

Extrait

Better Results Through Learning

Published by Dolan Management Portland, Oregon

Visit dolan2000.com for information

Better Results Through Learning

All Rights Reserved © 2001 by Dolan Management

This book may not be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or by any information storage retrieval system, without the permission in writing from the publisher.

Dolan Management 1001 SW 5th Ave Suite 1100 Portland OR 97204-1127
Published in eBook format by Dolan Management Converted by http://www.eBookIt.com
ISBN-13: 978-0-9710182-5-9
Produced in the United States of America
1. Are You Getting the Results You Need?

As a manager, you need results from a workforce that is knowledgeable, flexible, efficient, and resilient. Are you and your employees continuously learning and transforming yourselves to solve new problems and achieve new goals? Or are you less than satisfied with the learning and performance of your staff? Take this questionnaire to find out where you stand.
Think about your own organization as you answer these questions.
1. Are you facing more work with less staff?
2. Do you and your employees need to update technical skills, or learn new ways of doing business?
3. Is it difficult to find the time or money to send someone to training?
4. When you do send someone to training, do you often wonder if it was worth it?
5. Have you searched for ways to learn while on the job?
6. Do you find your staff repeating the same mistakes, or repeating mistakes made by other organizations around you?
7. Do you think your staff could learn from each other, and from you, if only there was the time?
If you answered YES to any of these questions, you will want to read this handbook. Inside are straightforward, easy-to-use answers and approaches to help you develop your staff into a learning community that steadily improves its performance and focuses on results.
How It Is Now
If you don’t have all the answers, you’re not alone. Most government offices are not aware of the best ways to develop their employees and thus protect their major investment and primary asset — human capital.

“Managers must come to realize that the accomplishment of their mission objectives in the future may well rest on learning to use their HRD resources in new ways.”
— Merit Systems Protection Board

Often leaders do not know how much or what kind of training is directed toward their organization’s real priorities. The 1993 report of the Vice President’s National Performance Review found the 1989 Volcker Commission’s conclusions in this area still relevant: 1
With few exceptions, most federal training is voluntary, individually focused . . . and bears little discernible relation to major agency objectives and missions . . .
Agencies are not sure what they should train for (short term or long term), who should get the lion’s share of resources (entry level or senior level), when employees need additional education (once a year or more often) and whether mid-career education is of value . . .
At both the career and presidential level, training is all-too-often ad hoc and self-initiated . . . 2
The Merit Systems Protection Board, in a 1995 study on human resource development (HRD) in the federal government, found that:
• Employees were sent to training for a variety of reasons not always related to performance needs.
• Many employees reported not receiving the training they needed to perform their jobs.
• Budget constraints were only part of the problem. More serious were the findings that training needs assessment procedures were often inadequate, and training was rarely linked to strategic planning for the organization.
• Some HRD specialists did not have the skills to support management in meeting organizational needs.
In its recommendations, the Board noted that “many organizations in the Government will have to fundamentally change the way they have looked at training and development . . . Managers must come to realize that the accomplishment of their mission objectives in the future may well rest on learning to use their HRD resources in new ways.” 3

Learning must be strategically managed to achieve the objectives of the organization and ensure the full utilization of the workforce. Particularly in times of constrained resources, training dollars must be targeted for the biggest payoffs.

Clearly, government offices are not going to get results when training is used as a tactical event, doled out on a first-come-first-served basis, or treated as a reward or high-cost “perk” for top leaders and professionals.
Learning must be strategically managed to achieve the objectives of the organization and ensure the full utilization of the workforce. Particularly in times of constrained resources, training dollars must be targeted for the biggest payoffs.
Most managers are only just realizing that they are the ones who have the business knowledge and the power in and across their own units to introduce new learning processes that will get results. They should be “getting everybody from the top of the human organization to the bottom doing things that make the business successful.” 4
How It Could Be
In the private sector, those corporations that have made a significant commitment to workforce learning are realizing equally significant benefits.
• Major corporations such as Motorola, Ford Motor, 3M, Federal Express, and Shell Oil have succeeded by continuously learning, by constant questioning and reflection and redefinition. Shell Oil managed the 1986 oil crisis far better than other oil companies because of its learning practices in building scenarios and strategic planning. 5
• Motorola calculates that every $1 spent on training delivers $30 in productivity gains within three years. 6
• Corning reports that its upfront investment in training has “a payback that is quite impressive.” Productivity is up, profits are up, defects and waste are down. 7
• Skandia, Dow Chemical, and Hughes Aircraft deliberately measure and manage the knowledge assets of their companies and have shown that enhancing knowledge assets improves financial performance. 8
• GE targets its training budget with precision, and invests in “work-outs,” corporate town meetings to solve organizational problems. “When an industry is in turmoil, productivity and people become the name of the game. That’s where we get our edge.” 9
• A recent American Management Association survey of 1,003 large and mid- sized corporations showed that companies that increased their training after announcing layoffs were twice as likely to report improved profits and productivity as the firms that didn’t invest in training. Among those that expanded training, 79 percent boosted long-term profits and 70 percent raised productivity. 10
• A study by the National Center on the Educational Quality of the Workforce at the University of Pennsylvania found that a dollar invested by a company in employee education was more than twice as effective in boosting the firm’s productivity as a dollar invested in new machinery. 11

“The only ideas that count are ‘A’ ideas. There is no second place. That means we have to get everybody in the organization involved. If you do that right, the best ideas will rise to the top.”
— Jack Welch, CEO, GE

Like their corporate counterparts before them, government leaders now face their own turbulence of reinvention, downsizing, and the heavy loss of knowledge workers through retirement. At the same time, the Government Performance and Results Act makes every agency accountable for strategic planning, measurement, and accomplishment of objectives.
These are all compelling reasons to find new ways to tap human capital to increase performance and productivity. President Clinton and Vice President Gore underscored the importance of unlocking the enormous human potential of the federal workforce in the recent Blair House Papers, their reinvention “marching orders” to the Cabinet. 12 Since learning is the essential process in expanding the capabilities of people and organizations, the next chapter outlines some approaches to learning that will give managers results.
2. Getting Better Results

In order to get better results in the workplace, managers must adopt a new perspective on learning. This means understanding the difference between “training” and “learning.”
Training is a term that has been used over the years to refer to instructors teaching individuals by presenting structured content in a controlled classroom environment. Recently, with the introduction of computers and distance learning technologies to the workplace, the term has taken on a broader meaning to include on-the-job training and technology-based training.

“Personally, I’m always ready to learn, although I do not always like being taught.”
— Winston Churchill

Learning , by contrast, is a much larger umbrella that covers all our efforts to absorb, understand, and respond to the world around us. Learning is social. Learning happens on the job every day. Learning is adapting, and it is vital for the survival and well-being of individuals as well as organizations.
Traditional training has structure and boundaries. Learning can break through boundaries to expand or reconfigure knowledge in new ways. The Canadian Centre for Management Development, in a report on continuous learning, puts it this way:
Training is something that is done to you, or that you do for someone else. Learning is something you do to and for yourself. Training implies that something already known is to be transferred to someone else. Learning, by contrast, implies a process of self-directed exploration and discovery, in search of something not yet known, something yet to be found. 13 In the government, traditional training has been the f