Lost 10 Point Night , livre ebook

Ecw Press - David Ward

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris

Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus

80 pages

English

Vous pourrez modifier la taille du texte de cet ouvrage

Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus

A propos
Informations
Extrait

Description

Jim Harrison grew up on the prairies, played Junior in Saskatchewan and pro with the Bruins, Leafs, Hawks and Oilers. Three years before a former teammate equalled the mark, Harrison set one of the most enduring and seemingly unbreakable records in professional hockey with three goals and seven helpers on January 30, 1973. And almost nobody remembers. This is Harrison's story: the games he played, the agent who stole from him, the woman he mourned, the fights he fought and the friends he made - and lost - including Bobby Orr and Darryl Sittler.

Sujets

Hockey sobre hielo

Ice hockey

Informations

Publié par	Ecw Press
Date de parution	01 septembre 2014
Nombre de lectures	0
EAN13	9781770905870
Langue	English
Poids de l'ouvrage	3 Mo

Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,0374€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.

Extrait

THE LOST
10 POINT
NIGHT
SEARCHING
FOR
MY
HOCKEY
HERO
***
JIM
HARRISON
BY
DAVID
WARD
ECW

For my brother

“Let’s pretend,” a voice suggested, “that we’re one of those Frank Capra movies.”
“How do we do that?”
“You know. Here we are, up in the heavens, looking down.”
“Right. And all you see on the screen is a bunch of nebulae and assorted twinklies.”
“Exactly.”
“With violins,” another voice suggested.
“Do they like this sort of stuff?”
“Some do, some don’t.”
“Okay. Here we go. Look down. Look away down there. Look at the town of Falconbridge, Ontario, population, thirteen thousand.”
“Thirteen thousand and one if we count him.”
“There he is. Staring right back at us, coincidentally.”
“Is it he with whom we are going to fuck around?”
“Well,” came a voice, considering, “he’s doing a pretty crackerjack job of fucking around with himself. We’re going to help him.”
“What’s he got? Marital problems? Financial difficulties? Mental anguishes? Emotional instability? Physical abnormalities and/or diseases?”
“He’s got all sorts of general problems. We’re here for something specific.”
“Like what, for instance?”
“You guys ever hear of a game called hockey?”
— Paul Quarrington,
Logan in Overtime

INTRODUCTION
This book is based on two premises.
One, I like sportswriter Stephen Brunt. I like him a lot — on radio, television, and in print. I like the way he sees the world in a cultural context. I like that he employs his sensibilities by simply describing circumstances and asking basic questions. Stephen practices sportswriting like it’s a subtly subversive science rather than an undertaking best suited for blunt tools.
Yet I styled this book as a challenge to Stephen, because I wish he more often accessed a different group of personalities. I want to hear what he has to share about the B-list or lower — a gang who are not so guarded, because they have so little to lose.
Maybe challenge is not the right word. I think this book is more my contribution to the discussion than a confrontation or test. Because as conceited as I sound, anchoring myself alongside Brunt, I see this book as a response to Searching for Bobby Orr and Gretzky’s Tears . Except that my subjects don’t come from any A-list. Quite the opposite actually — I’ve tried to give voice to those who don’t always believe they have one.
It’s possible I’ve built the book this way because, as a first-time participant in the popular media, I can’t compete. The A-list has no interest in talking to me. Or so their publicists say. But even when I do get past the uncivilized front line, the celebrated stars seldom give me anything of value compared to the jilted journeymen.
The second premise on which this book is based is that it is part biography, part memoir, and all cathartic — catharsis being the release of emotions through art. So as much as I would like to begin this book with a standard “all errors are mine,” they’re not. Not that I’m not accountable for my interpretations, but there are things people say that don’t always support the facts. Like when an aging athlete insists he left home at a younger age than the records indicate, I don’t want to deny his details. I want to share such events as the speaker remembers them, because I find it informative when subjects emphasize their memories.
It has been a blessing that my subject was a third-line center, that when I went in search of him he didn’t immediately shut the door in my face. Because that too is what this book is about — a 50-year-old man’s wish to get close to his childhood hero. I hope it’s of value to you, but more than that, I’m keeping my fingers crossed that the process and the product continue to be cathartic for the author and his subject.
“What have you been up to?” a friend asks.
“Writing,” I reply.
“Writing about what?”
“I went in search of my childhood hero. So I’m writing about that.”
I’m aware that simply saying “childhood hero” leaves things wide open, but I’m wary of saying more because not everyone is a hockey fanatic. A lot of Canadians resent the space that hockey occupies. And many find the game too violent. Plus, there are a lot of casual fans who, when I say I’m writing a book about Jim Harrison, don’t recognize his name.
“Did you say Henderson?”
“No, Harrison . Jim Harrison.”
“What’s his story?”
“Bruins, Leafs, Hawks, and Oilers. He wasn’t a huge star but he was important to me. In the early ’70s, Jim was a big, mop-topped tough guy with bushy black sideburns — the kind of guy who would just as soon run over you as score a goal. That was all pretty exciting to me as a child. I liked the stars, but I loved the plumbers. I was a Don Cherry kind of kid long before I knew what a Cherry was.
“Years later, Jim fell on bumpy times after injuries got the best of him, and Alan Eagleson ripped him off. Today he’s trying to correct some of the injustices he’s been subjected to and overcome some of the injuries he suffered.”
Now, I know I lost the listener early but by saying “Eagleson,” I’ve hit on something many Canadians remember: “Oh yeah — that crook. I’d say your Henderson buddy’s not the only guy he ripped off.”
“Harrison.”
“What?”
“Not Henderson. Jim Harrison .”

*
I’m watching Leafs and Flyers, a game from February 6, 1971. I remember seeing this game as a child, live on television. I watched it from the floor of my family’s modest Kitchener, Ontario, home. But today I’m viewing it on a laptop while sitting in outport Newfoundland. Thanks to the miracle of Leafs TV.
What a concept, eh? An entire television network dedicated to a terrible hockey team. Were there really folks who could have conceived of such in ’71? Not that there weren’t prophets who could predict the future of television and other technologies. But that fans could’ve imagined the next four decades would bring so little glory to their beloved blue and white, and that such pathetic play would still result in enough viewer interest to support a 24/7 TV channel.
“I’m Paul Hendrick, and welcome to this Molson Canadian Classic ‘ Game in an Hour , ’” our host says, and right away I’m wondering why people in production insist on dumbing things down: why Leafs TV believes viewers require an abridged version of the original; how they assume that fans don’t value the events that go on between goals, saves, and periods; and why they think we’d be intrigued with the idea of seeing only part of the original proceedings in one sitting — on a station that cycles the same old stuff over and over anyway.
“In the winter of 1971, the Leafs, under the guidance of general manager Jim Gregory and head coach Johnny McLellan, have them selves a formidable roster,” Hendrick either informs or reminds us, “one that they hope would compete well into the following decade. However, problems would ensue a year later, as the WHA [World Hockey Association] would raid the Toronto Maple Leafs and things certainly would change, for a while.” Understated? Such that Hendrick avoids articulating the arrogant role Leaf ownership played in the rival league’s raid? Yes. “But in the short term, however, things were looking good … Just the previous week the Leafs had acquired Bernie Parent in exchange for forward Mike Walton and another goaltender in Bruce Gamble …
“To the gondola we go.” From there we see black-and-white imagery of Dave Keon and Bobby Clarke awaiting a faceoff in the Flyers end. Leafs wear white, Flyers orange. Actually, almost everything is an attractive white, because there’s no ugly advertising except for the gaudy graphics that Leafs TV employs. Graphics that, against 40-year-old footage, look so out of place they leave me embarrassed for whoever makes such aesthetic choices. It’s like, who would put a bumper sticker on the Mona Lisa ?
While play prepares to resume, we hear Bill Hewitt’s nasal accent as he comments on the big trade, in which Philadelphia sent Parent and their second-round choice in the upcoming Amateur Draft — Rick Kehoe — to Toronto for Gamble, Walton, and the Leafs’ first-round selection — Pierre Plante — in the same sweepstakes. The Flyers then parlayed Walton into a deal with Boston for forwards Danny Schock and Rick MacLeish. Both trades brought drama to what otherwise might have been a mundane mid-winter meeting between two mediocre clubs.
The puck is dropped and suddenly I’m 12 years old again. The Leafs of my youth are all present, exactly as I remember them: Garry Monahan and Billy MacMillan take their rightful positions alongside Keon. Jim Dorey and Bob Baun are on defence, and Jacques Plante is in goal. I find it fascinating how slender Plante is. If he played in today’s game, he’d be outfitted with whatever bulk the rules would allow and then some.
Disappointed that Parent didn’t start, I am pleased to see Gamble is in the Flyers’ net when he flips a puck over the glass in a move that today would result in a delay-of-game penalty. I love the way neither team’s coach feels compelled to change lines during the stop in play, keeping the key matchup of Keon and Clarke on the ice, in an era when shifts were much longer.
A change on the fly brings out fresh troops. Then, in a very familiar, familial way, the Leafs’ Jim McKenny, behind his own net, pauses with the puck, giving teammates Paul Henderson, Norm Ullman, and Ron Ellis a chance to set up for success. Not yet three minutes old, the game has settled into an exchange of efforts to maintain puck possession when, after an uneventful shift from the Ullman line, the Harrison trio hits the ice. I readily recognize Jim Harrison not only because he is flanked by George Armstrong and Brian Spencer, but because of his clumsy skating style and Beatles hairdo.
Judging b