Reading with John Clare argues that at the heart of contemporary biopolitical thinking is an insistent repression of poetry. By returning to the moment at which biopolitics is said to emerge simultaneously with romanticism, this project renews our understanding of the operations of contemporary politics and its relation to aesthetics across two centuries.Guyer focuses on a single, exemplary case: the poetry and autobiographical writing of the British poet John Clare (1793-1864). Reading Clare in combination with contemporary theories of biopolitics, Guyer reinterprets romanticism's political legacies, specifically the belief that romanticism is a direct precursor to the violent nationalisms and redemptive environmentalisms of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.Guyer offers an alternative account of many of romanticism's foundational concepts, like home, genius, creativity, and organicism. She shows that contemporary critical theories of biopolitics, despite repeatedly dismissing the aesthetic or poetic dimensions of power as a culpable ideology, emerge within the same rhetorical tradition as the romanticism they denounce. The book thus compels a rethinking of the biopolitical critique of poetry and an attendant reconsideration of romanticism and its concepts.
Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,1250€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.
Extrait
R E A D I N G W I T H J O H N C L A R E
Sara Guyer and Brian McGrath, series editors ît Z embraces modes o crîtîcîsm uncontaîned by conventîona notîons o hîstory, perîodîcîty, and cuture, and commîtted to the work o readîng. Books în the serîes may seem untîmey, anachronîstîc, or out o touch wîth contemporary trends because they have arrîved too eary or too ate. At east sînce Frîedrîch Schege, thînkîng that airms îterature’s own untîmeîness has been named romantîcîsm. Recaîng thîs hîstory, ît Z exempîIes the survîva o romantîcîsm as a mode o contemporary crîtîcîsm, as we as orms o contemporary crîtîcîsm that demonstrate the unuIed possîbîîtîes o romantîcîsm. Whether or not they ocus on the romantîc perîod, books în thîs serîes epîtomîze romantîcîsm as a way o thînkîng that compes another reatîon to the present. ît Z îs the Irst book serîes to take serîousy thîs capacîous sense o romantîcîsm. ïts books expore the creatîve potentîa o readîng’s untîmeîness and hîstory’s enîgmatîc orce.
A rîghts reserved. No part o thîs pubîcatîon may be reproduced, stored în a retrîeva system, or transmîtted în any orm or by any means—eectronîc, mechanîca, photocopy, recordîng, or any other—except or brîe quotatîons în prînted revîews, wîthout the prîor permîssîon o the pubîsher.
Fordham Unîversîty Press has no responsîbîîty or the persîstence or accuracy o URs or externa or thîrd-party ïnternet websîtes reerred to în thîs pubîcatîon and does not guarantee that any content on such websîtes îs, or wî remaîn, accurate or approprîate.
Fordham Unîversîty Press aso pubîshes îts books în a varîety o eectronîc ormats. Some content that appears în prînt may not be avaîabe în eectronîc books.
Vîsît us onîne at www.ordhampress.com.
îbrary o Congress Cataogîng-în-Pubîcatîon Data
Guyer, Sara Emîîe. Readîng wîth John Care : bîopoetîcs, sovereîgnty, romantîcîsm / Sara Guyer. — Fîrst edîtîon. pages cm. — (ît z up) ïncudes bîbîographîca reerences and îndex. ïSBN 978-0-8232-6557-2 (hardback) — ïSBN 978-0-8232-6558-9 (paper) aspects. 2. Bîopoîtîcs. 3. Care, John, 1793–1864. ï.Tîte.1. Aesthetîcs—Poîtîca BH301.P64G89 2015 821'.7—dc23 2014047801
Prînted în the Unîted States o Amerîca
17 16 15 5 4 3 2 1
Fîrst edîtîon
For Sadie and Solomon
This page intentionally left blank
Contents
Acknowedgments ïntroductîon: The îe o Readîng 1. The Vîabîîty o Poetry 2. The Orîgîns and Ends o Poetîc Genîus 3. Can the Poet Speak? 4. ïnventîons o Se-ïdentîty 5. The Poetîcs o Homeessness Coda: The Readîng o îe Notes Bîbîography ïndex
îx 1 11 25 40 57 78 101 103 117 125
This page intentionally left blank
Acknowledgments
Thîs book orîgînated în and drew sustenance rom both înstîtutîons and în-dîvîduas. Whîe the work o wrîtîng happens outsîde o ectures, department meetîngs, cassrooms, amîy vacatîons, trîps to the gym, and dînners that run ate înto the nîght, a o the thîngs that take the pace o wrîtîng seem to have nourîshed ît (and me) în ways that are prooundy dîicut to measure. ï Irst decîded to wrîte about John Care when ï taught a course on “Romantîc Natures” as a postdoctora eow at the Unîversîty o Caîornîa, ïrvîne. Care was not a poet that ï had studîed în the cassroom, but the course—and a memorabe car-rîde conversatîon about Care and prosopo-poeîa wîth my eow commuter Steven Mîer—et me hooked. Thîs book woud not exîst î ï had not had the opportunîty to teach somethîng ï dîd not aready know. At ïrvîne, and then at the Unîversîty o Wîsconsîn–Madîson, my students have been constanty open-mînded and usuay bown away by the experîence o readîng Care. ï want to acknowedge în partîcuar the students în my courses on “Romantîcîsm and the Poetîcs o Homeessness” and “Romantîc Autobîography,” where Care hed a centra pace. My department chaîrs în Madîson, Mîchae Bernard-Donas, Tom Schaub, Theresa Keey, and Caroîne evîne, ofered warm support both persona and proessîona, whîch heped enormousy în the competîon o thîs project. The deans and assocîate deans o the Coege o etters & Scîence, Gary Sandeur, Magdaena Hauner, John Kar Schoz, and Susan Zaeske, a encouraged my înteectua and înstîtutîona projects: ï thank them. ï am grateu to the Wîsconsîn Aumnî Research Foundatîon and the Graduate Schoo o the Unîversîty o Wîsconsîn or învestîng resources înto thîs project. Nancy and Davîd Borghesî, rîends o UW–Madîson who have now become persona rîends too, ofered tremendous support or my research, as dîd the George A. and Eîza Gardner Howard Foundatîon, whîch provîded me the resources to spend a year (ha o ît în Parîs) devoted to competîon o thîs book. The Andrew W. Meon Foundatîon granted me the opportunîty to orga-nîze a John E. Sawyer Semînar on “îe în Past and Present” wîth Rîck Keer. Thîs mîght just have been another dîstractîon rom wrîtîng, but înstead ît turned out to generate new înes o înquîry. ï am thanku to the partîcîpants