Critics of American exceptionalism usually view it as a destructive force eroding the radical energies of social movements and aesthetic practices. In A Desire Called America, Christian P. Haines confronts a troubling paradox: Some of the most provocative political projects in the United States are remarkably invested in American exceptionalism. Riding a strange current of U.S. literature that draws on American exceptionalism only to overturn it in the name of utopian desire, Haines reveals a tradition of viewing the United States as a unique and exemplary political model while rejecting exceptionalism's commitments to nationalism, capitalism, and individualism. Through Walt Whitman, Emily Dickinson, William S. Burroughs, and Thomas Pynchon, Haines brings to light a radically different version of the American dream-one in which political subjects value an organization of social life that includes democratic self-governance, egalitarian cooperation, and communal property.A Desire Called America brings utopian studies and the critical discourse of biopolitics to bear upon each other, suggesting that utopia might be less another place than our best hope for confronting authoritarianism, neoliberalism, and a resurgent exclusionary nationalism.
Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,1400€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.
Extrait
A D e s i r e C a l l e d A m e r i c a
A Desire Called America
Biopolitics, Utopia, and the Literary Commons
Christian P. Haines
f o r d h a m u n i v e r s i t y p r e s s New York 2019
Fordham University Press gratefully acknowledges financial assistance and support provided for the publication of this book by Penn State University.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any other—except for brief quotations in printed reviews, without the prior permission of the publisher.
Fordham University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party Internet websites referred to in this publication and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
Fordham University Press also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books.
Visit us online at www.fordhampress.com.
Library of Congress Control Number: 2019939349
Printed in the United States of America 21 20 19 5 4 3 2 1 First edition
For my mother, Donna M. Haines:
To the moon and back.
1.
2.
3.
4.
c o n t e n t s
Introduction: Impossibly American
A Revolutionary Haunt: Utopian Frontiers in William S. Burroughs’s Late Trilogy The People and the People: Democracy and Vitalism in Walt Whitman’s 1855Leaves of Grass74 Nobody’s Wife: Affective Economies of Marriage in Emily Dickinson Idle Power: The Riot, the Commune, and Capitalist Time in Thomas Pynchon’sAgainst the Day157
Coda: Assembling the Future
Acknowledgments Notes Index
3
1
3
114
205
209 213 241
i n t r o d u c t i o n Impossibly American
“Make America Great Again.” The short-term history of this phrase speaks to Donald Trump’s strange combination of anti-establishment rhetoric, political and financial corruption, verbal and physical violence, and popular appeal. It conjures up images of rallies in which racist, ableist, and xenopho-bic cries are delivered with religious fervor. These rallies are a postmodern tent revival in which violent intensity promises to accelerate providence, though a providence that has as much to do with entrepreneurial success 1 as anything spiritual. Trump and his supporters are winners; the rest of the world are losers; and America will return to its appointed position of greatness only if it gives itself over to this fundamental truth. It’s tempting to see Trump’s rise from businessman to candidate to president as unprecedented, and certainly the zeal he inspires in a large portion of the U.S. electorate is quite distinct. That being said, the Trump phenomenon conforms to Stuart Hall’s articulation of authoritarian popu-lism as “an exceptional form of the capitalist state —which, unlike classical fascism, has retained most (though not all) of the formal representative institution in place, and which at the same time has been able to construct 2 around itself an active popular consent.” Hall was analyzing Thatcherism