Maurice Blanchot and Theodor W. Adorno are among the most difficult but also the most profound thinkers in twentieth-century aesthetics. While their methods and perspectives differ widely, they share a concern with the negativity of the artwork conceived in terms of either its experience and possibility or its critical expression. Such negativity is neither nihilistic nor pessimistic but concerns the status of the artwork and its autonomy in relation to its context or its experience. For both Blanchot and Adorno negativity is the key to understanding the status of the artwork in post-Kantian aesthetics and, although it indicates how art expresses critical possibilities, albeit negatively, it also shows that art bears an irreducible ambiguity such that its meaning can always negate itself. This ambiguity takes on an added material significance when considered in relation to language as the negativity of the work becomes aesthetic in the further sense of being both sensible and experimental, and in doing so the language of the literary work becomes a form of thinking that enables materiality to be thought in its ambiguity.In a series of rich and compelling readings, William S. Allen shows how an original and rigorous mode of thinking arises within Blanchot's early writings and how Adorno's aesthetics depends on a relation between language and materiality that has been widely overlooked. Furthermore, by reconsidering the problem of the autonomous work of art in terms of literature, a central issue in modernist aesthetics is given a greater critical and material relevance as a mode of thinking that is abstract and concrete, rigorous and ambiguous. While examples of this kind of writing can be found in the works of Blanchot and Beckett, the demands that such texts place on readers only confirm the challenges and the possibilities that literary autonomy poses to thought.
Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,3200€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.
Extrait
Aestetics o Negativity
Series Board
James Bernauer
Drucîa Corne
Tomas R. Fynn Kevîn Hart Rîcard Kearney
Jean-uc Marîon
Adrîaan Peperzak
Tomas Seean
Hent de Vrîes
Merod Westpa
Mîcae Zîmmerman
Jon D. Caputo,series editor
This page intentionally left blank
W I L L I A M S . A L L E N
Aestetics o Negativity BlancHot, Adorno, and Autonomy
FO R D H A M UN I V E R S I T Y PR E S S New York 2016 ■
A rîgts reserved. No part o tîs pubîcatîon may be reproduced, stored în a retrîeva system, or transmîtted în any orm or by any means—eectronîc, mecanîca, potocopy, recordîng, or any oter—except or brîe quotatîons în prînted revîews, wîtout te prîor permîssîon o te pubîser.
Fordam Unîversîty Press as no responsîbîîty or te persîstence or accuracy o URs or externa or tîrd-party ïnternet websîtes reerred to în tîs pubîcatîon and does not guarantee tat any content on suc websîtes îs, or wî remaîn, accurate or approprîate.
Fordam Unîversîty Press aso pubîses îts books în a varîety o eectronîc ormats. Some content tat appears în prînt may not be avaîabe în eectronîc books.
Vîsît us onîne at www.ordampress.com.
îbrary o Congress Cataogîng-în-Pubîcatîon Data
Introduction: Abstract and Concrete Modernity he anguage o te Everyday, 14
PA RTC I : O N T R E-TE M P S Autonomous Literature: he Maniesto and te Novel he Formatîve Drîve ater Kant, 37 Benjamîn’s ■ Hîstorîca Crîtîque o te Nove, 45 Hege and te ■ Ambîvaence o Prose, 53 he Obscurities o Artistic Innovation Bancot on te New Musîc, 68 Adorno’s Notîon o ■ Aestetîc Materîa, 74
PA RT I I : NE G AT I V E SPA C E S Dead Transcendence: Blancot, Paulan, Kaka Transdescendence o te Wrîter, 99 Negatîng ■ Transcendence, 108
ix xiii
2
5
9
1
9
8
3
4
5
6
7
89
An Image o hougt inhomas l’Obscurhe ïdea o îterature as Force o Repusîon, 122 Recapîtuatîon: ■ Bataîe and Kossowskî, 127 Indiferent Reading inAminadabMaarmé and te Space o Wrîtîng, 139 Materîa Vîsîon, ■ ïmagînary Space, 145
PA RT I I I : MAT E R I A L AM B I G U I T Y
he LanguageLike Quality o te Artwork Mîmetîc ïdentîty and te Dîaectîcs o Sembance, 165 he Form ■ o înguîstîcaîty în anguage, 178
he Possibility o Speculative Writing Hege, Bancot, and te Work o Wrîtîng, 199 Serîa Hîatus ■ Form în Höderîn, 209 înguîstîc Works o Art, 214 ■
PA RTG I V : R E Y LI T E R AT U R E Eco Location: Beckett’sComment c’esthe Negativity o hinking troug Language
Appendix:THomas l’Obscur,Capter 1
Notes BibliograpHy Index
viii■Contents
114
135
161
191
223 241
255
263 299 313
Abbreviations
Were doube page reerences ave been used tey reer to te Frenc or German text and ten te Engîs versîons, as transatîons ave generay been modîied.
A
Am
AT
Cap
CC
CM
Maurîce Bancot,Amînadab(Parîs: Gaîmard, ); tr. Jef Fort asAmînadab(încon: Unîversîty o Nebraska Press, ). Bancot,L’amîtîé(Parîs: Gaîmard, ); tr. Eîzabet Rottenberg asFrîendsîp(Stanord: Stanord Unîversîty Press, ). heodor W. Adorno,Ästetîsce heorîe, ed. Grete Adorno and Ro Tîedemann,Gesammete Scrîten, vo. (Frankurt am Maîn: Surkamp, ); tr. Robert Huot-Kentor asAestetîc heory(Mînneapoîs: Unîversîty o Mînnesota Press, ). Kar Marx,Capîta: A Crîtîque o Poîtîca Economy, vo. , tr. Ben Fowkes (Harmondswort: Penguîn, ). Adorno and Water Benjamîn,he Compete Correspondence 1928–1940, ed. Henrî onîtz, tr. Nîcoas Waker (Cambrîdge: Poîty, ). Marx and Frîedrîc Enges,he Communîst Manîesto, ed. Davîd Mcean, tr. Samue Moore (Oxord: Oxord Unîversîty Press, ).