Acute kidney injury (AKI) in the ICU is associated with poorer prognosis. Hydroxyethylstarch (HES) solutions are fluid resuscitation colloids frequently used in the ICU with controversial nephrotoxic adverse effects. Our study objective was to evaluate HES impact on renal function and organ failures. Methods This observational retrospective study included 363 patients hospitalized for more than 72 hours in our ICU. A hundred and sixty eight patients received HES during their stay and 195 did not. We recorded patients' baseline characteristics on admission and type and volume of fluid resuscitation during the first 3 weeks of ICU stay. We also noted the evolution of urine output, the risk of renal dysfunction, injury to the kidney, failure of kidney function, loss of kidney function and end-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) classification and sepsis related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score over 3 weeks. Results Patients in the HES group were more severely ill on admission but AKI incidence was similar, as well as ICU mortality. The evolution of urine output ( P = 0.74), RIFLE classification ( P = 0.44) and SOFA score ( P = 0.23) was not different. However, HES volumes administered were low (763+/-593 ml during the first 48 hours). Conclusions Volume expansion with low volume HES 130 kDa/0.4 was not associated with AKI.
R E S E A R C HOpen Access Resuscitation with low volume hydroxyethylstarch 130 kDa/0.4 is not associated with acute kidney injury 1* 11 12 1 Nicolas Boussekey, Raphaël Darmon , Joachim Langlois , Serge Alfandari , Patrick Devos , Agnes Meybeck , 1 11 Arnaud Chiche , Hugues Georges , Olivier Leroy
Abstract Introduction:Acute kidney injury (AKI) in the ICU is associated with poorer prognosis. Hydroxyethylstarch (HES) solutions are fluid resuscitation colloids frequently used in the ICU with controversial nephrotoxic adverse effects. Our study objective was to evaluate HES impact on renal function and organ failures. Methods:This observational retrospective study included 363 patients hospitalized for more than 72 hours in our ICU. A hundred and sixty eight patients received HES during their stay and 195 did not. We recorded patients’ baseline characteristics on admission and type and volume of fluid resuscitation during the first 3 weeks of ICU stay. We also noted the evolution of urine output, the risk of renal dysfunction, injury to the kidney, failure of kidney function, loss of kidney function and endstage kidney disease (RIFLE) classification and sepsis related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score over 3 weeks. Results:Patients in the HES group were more severely ill on admission but AKI incidence was similar, as well as ICU mortality. The evolution of urine output (P= 0.74), RIFLE classification (P= 0.44) and SOFA score (P= 0.23) was not different. However, HES volumes administered were low (763+/593 ml during the first 48 hours). Conclusions:Volume expansion with low volume HES 130 kDa/0.4 was not associated with AKI.
Introduction Hydroxyethylstarches (HES) are resuscitation solutes lar gely employed in intensive care units (ICU) [1]. How ever, their potential nephrotoxic effect is controversial [218] and acute kidney injury (AKI) in the ICU is asso ciated with a 60% mortality rate [19]. The 2001 prospec tive randomized study by Schortgen and colleagues [5] showed that plasma volume expansion with HES was an independent risk factor for AKI compared with gelatins. More recently, the volume substitution and insulin ther apy in severe sepsis (VISEP) study [6] compared ringer’s lactate with HES 200 kDa/0.5 for fluid resuscitation in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. HES use was associated with renal failure and increased need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). Renal failure was directly related to the volume of HES administered with
* Correspondence: nboussekey@chtourcoing.fr 1 Intensive care and infectious disease unit, Tourcoing hospital, 135, rue du Président Coty Tourcoing BP 619, 59208 France
a doseeffect relation. Coupled with the results of another recent study [7], some experts addressed the question of the continuing usefulness of HES use in the ICU [9]. However, published studies compared HES with different molecular weights, degrees of substitution and diluents and used variable definitions of kidney fail ure. Therefore, we decided to conduct a practice survey including all the patients hospitalized in our ICU during a twoyear period to evaluate if plasma volume expan sion with a‘modern’HES 130 kDa/0.4 had an impact on kidney function according to the validated RIFLE (Risk of renal dysfunction, Injury to the kidney, Failure of kidney function, Loss of kidney function and End stage kidney disease) classification.
Materials and methods Inclusion criteria and study goal We included all the patients hospitalized for the first time for more than 72 hours in the ICU of Tourcoing