Fresh Light from the Ancient Monuments

vien - A. H. (Archibald Henry) Sayce

Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres

178 pages

English

Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe
Tout savoir sur nos offres

A propos
Informations
Extrait

Description

The Project Gutenberg EBook of Fresh Light from the Ancient Monuments by Archibald Henry Sayce This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever.You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at http://www.gutenberg.org/license Title: Fresh Light from the Ancient Monuments Author: Archibald Henry Sayce Release Date: June 18, 2010 [Ebook 32883] Language: English ***START OF FRESH LIGHT THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FROM THE ANCIENT MONUMENTS*** Fresh Light from the Ancient Monuments A Sketch of the Most Striking Confirmations of the Bible, From Recent Discoveries in: Egypt. Palestine. Assyria. Babylonia. Asia Minor. by Archibald Henry Sayce, M.A. Deputy Professor of Comparative Philology, Oxford. Hon. LL.D., Dublin. Second Edition. London: The Religious Tract Society. 36, Paternoster Row; 65, St. Paul's Churchyard. 1884 Contents Preface. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 Chapter I. Introduction.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 Chapter II. The Book of Genesis.. . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 Chapter III. The Exodus out of Egypt.. . . . . . . . . . .48 Chapter IV. The Moabite Stone and the Inscription of Siloam.61 Chapter V. The Empire of the Hittites.. . . . . . . . . . .76 Chapter VI. The Assyrian Invasions.. . . . . . . . . . . .83 Chapter VII. Nebuchadrezzar and Cyrus.. . . . . . . . . . 113 Appendix I.

Informations

Publié par	vien
Publié le	08 décembre 2010
Nombre de lectures	36
Langue	English
Poids de l'ouvrage	1 Mo

Extrait

The Project Gutenberg EBook of Fresh Light from the Ancient Monuments by Archibald Henry Sayce

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at http://www.gutenberg.org/license

Title: Fresh Light from the Ancient Monuments

Author: Archibald Henry Sayce

Release Date: June 18, 2010 [Ebook 32883]

Language: English

***START OF FRESH LIGHT

THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FROM THE ANCIENT MONUMENTS***

Fresh Light from the Ancient Monuments A Sketch of the Most Striking Confirmations of the Bible, From Recent Discoveries in: Egypt. Palestine. Assyria. Babylonia. Asia Minor. by Archibald Henry Sayce, M.A. Deputy Professor of Comparative Philology, Oxford. Hon. LL.D., Dublin. Second Edition. London: The Religious Tract Society. 36, Paternoster Row; 65, St. Paul's Churchyard. 1884

Contents

Preface. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Chapter I. Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Chapter II. The Book of Genesis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Chapter III. The Exodus out of Egypt. . . . . . . . . . . . 48 Chapter IV. The Moabite Stone and the Inscription of Siloam. 61 Chapter V. The Empire of the Hittites. . . . . . . . . . . . 76 Chapter VI. The Assyrian Invasions. . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 Chapter VII. Nebuchadrezzar and Cyrus. . . . . . . . . . . 113 Appendix I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 Appendix II. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 Index. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 Footnotes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155

[001]

Preface.

Monument of a Hittite king, accompanied by an inscription in Hittite hieroglyphics, discovered on the site of Carchemish and now in the British Museum.

The object of this little book is explained by its title. Discovery after discovery has been pouring in upon us from Oriental lands, and the accounts given only ten years ago of the results of Oriental research are already beginning to be antiquated. It is useful, therefore, to take stock of our present knowledge, and to see how far it bears out that “old story” which has been familiar to us from our childhood. The same spirit of scepticism which had rejected the early legends of Greece and Rome had laid

Preface.

its hands also on the Old Testament, and had determined that the sacred histories themselves were but a collection of myths and fables. But suddenly, as with the wand of a magician, the ancient eastern world has been reawakened to life by the spade of the explorer and the patient skill of the decipherer, and we now find ourselves in the presence of monuments which bear the names or recount the deeds of the heroes of Scripture. One by one these “stones crying out” have been examined or more perfectly explained, while others of equal importance are being continually added to them.

What striking confirmations of the Bible narrative have been afforded by the latest discoveries will be seen from the following pages. In many cases confirmation has been accompanied by illustration. Unexpected light has been thrown upon facts and statements hitherto obscure, or a wholly new explanation has been given of some event recorded by the inspired writer. What can be more startling than the discovery of the great Hittite Empire, the very existence of which had been forgotten, and which yet once contended on equal terms with Egypt on the one side and Assyria on the other? The allusions to the Hittites in the Old Testament, which had been doubted by a sceptical criticism, have been shown to be fully in accordance with the facts, and their true place in history has been pointed out.

But the account of the Hittite Empire is not the only discovery of the last four or five years about which this book has to speak. Inscriptions of Sargon have cleared up the difficulties attending the tenth and eleventh chapters of Isaiah's prophecies, and have proved that no “ideal” campaign of an “ideal” Assyrian king is described in them. The campaign, on the contrary, was a very real one, and when Isaiah delivered his prophecy the Assyrian monarch was marching down upon Jerusalem from the north, and was about to be “the rod” of God's anger upon its sins. Ten years before the overthrow of Sennacherib's army his father, Sargon, had captured Jerusalem, but a “remnant” escaped the horrors of

[002]

[003]

[004]

Fresh Light from the Ancient Monuments

the siege, and returned in penitence “unto the mighty God.” Perhaps the most remarkable of recent discoveries is that which relates to Cyrus and his conquest of Babylonia. The history of the conquest as told by Cyrus himself is now in our hands, and it has obliged us to modify many of the views, really derived from Greek authors, which we had read into the words of Scripture. Cyrus, we know now upon his own authority, was a polytheist, and not a Zoroastrian; he was king of Elam, not of Persia. It was Elam, and not Persia, as Isaiah's prophecies declared, which invaded Babylon. Babylon itself was taken without a siege, and Mr. Bosanquet may therefore have been right in holding that the Darius of Daniel was Darius the son of Hystaspes. Hardly less interesting has been the discovery of the inscription of Siloam, which reveals to us the very characters used by the Jews in the time of Isaiah, perhaps even in the time of Solomon himself. The discovery has cast a flood of light on the early topography of Jerusalem, and has made it clear as the daylight that the Jews of the royal period were not the rude and barbarous people it has been the fashion of an unbelieving criticism to assume, but a cultured and literary population. Books must have been as plentiful among them as they were in PhS nicia or Assyria; nor must we forget the results of the excavations undertaken last year in the land of Goshen. Pithom, the treasure-city built by the Israelites, has been disinterred, and the date of the Exodus has been fixed. M. Naville has even found there bricks made without straw. But the old records of Egypt and Assyria have a further interest than a merely historical one. They tell us what were the religious doctrines and aspirations of those who composed them, and what was their conception of their duty towards God and man. We have only to compare the hymns and psalms and prayers of these ancient peoples—seeking “the Lord, if haply they might feel after Him and find Him”—with the fuller lights revealed in

Preface.

the pages of the Old Testament, to discover how wide was the chasm that lay between the two. The one was seeking what the other had already found. The Hebrew prophet was the forerunner and herald of the Gospel, and the light shed by the Gospel had been reflected back upon him. He saw already “the Sun of Righteousness” rising in the east; the psalmist of Shinar or the devout worshipper of Asshur were like unto those “upon whom no day has dawned.”

[009]

[010]

Chapter I. Introduction.

How the Cuneiform Inscriptions were deciphered.—Grotefend's guess.—Lassen and Rawlin-son's studies.—Discoveries of Botta, Layard, George Smith, and Rassam.—Certainty of our present knowledge.

The decipherment of the cuneiform or wedge-shaped inscriptions of Assyria has been one of the most marvellous achievements of the present century. It has often been asked how Assyrian scholars have been enabled to read an Assyrian text with almost as much certainty as a page of the Old Testament, although both the language and the characters in which it is written were utterly unknown but a few years ago. A brief history of the origin and progress of the decipherment will best answer the question. Travellers had discovered inscriptions engraved in cuneiform, or, as they were also termed, arrow-headed, characters on the ruined monuments of Persepolis and other ancient sites in Persia. Some of these monuments were known to have been erected by the Achæmenian princes—Darius, the son of Hystaspes, and his successors—and it was therefore inferred that the inscriptions also had been carved by order of the same kings. The inscriptions were in three different systems of cuneiform writing; and, since the three kinds of inscription were always placed side by side, it was evident that they represented different versions of the same text. The subjects of the Persian kings belonged to more than one race, and just as in the present day a Turkish pasha in the East has to publish an edict in Turkish, Arabic, and Persian, if it is to be understood by all the populations under his charge, so the Persian kings were obliged to use the language and system of writing peculiar to each of the nations they governed, whenever

Chapter I. Introduction.

they wished their proclamations to be read and understood by them. It was clear that the three versions of the Achæmenian inscriptions were addressed to the three chief populations of the Persian Empire, and that the one which invariably came first was composed in ancient Persian, the language of the sovereign himself. Now this Persian version happened to offer the decipherer less difficulties than the two others which accompanied it. The number of distinct characters employed in writing it did not exceed forty, while the words were divided from one another by a slanting wedge. Some of the words contained so many characters that it was plain that these latter must denote letters, and not syllables, and that consequently the Persian cuneiform system must have consisted of an alphabet, and not of a syllabary. It was further plain that the inscriptions had to be read from left to right, since the ends of all the lines were exactly underneath one another on the left side, whereas they terminated irregularly on the right; indeed, the last line sometimes ended at a considerable distance from the right-hand extremity of the inscription. The clue to the decipherment of the inscriptions was first discovered by the successful guess of a German scholar, Grotefend. Grotefend noticed that the inscriptions generally began with three or four words, one of which varied, while the others remained unchanged. The variable word had three forms, though the same form always appeared on the same monument. Grotefend, therefore, conjectured that this word represented the name of a king, the words which followed it being the royal titles. One of the supposed names appeared much oftener than the others, and as it was too short for Artaxerxes and too long for Cyrus, it was evident that it must stand either for Darius or for Xerxes. A study of the classical authors showed Grotefend that certain of the monuments on which it was found had been constructed by Darius, and he accordingly gave to the characters

[011]