Watergate: The Presidential Scandal That Shook America. By Keith W ...
2 pages
Français

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris

Watergate: The Presidential Scandal That Shook America. By Keith W ...

-

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus
2 pages
Français
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus

Description

Watergate: The Presidential Scandal That Shook America. By Keith W ...

Informations

Publié par
Nombre de lectures 98
Langue Français

Extrait

Book Reviews
723
skills, while others have had to struggle—Ger-
ald Ford, Carter, and George H. W. Bush.
Speechwriters many times have had access
to presidential polling, and speechwriting and
polling are part of the promotion of the image
and style of the modern presidency. Joe
McGinniss in
The Selling of the President,
1968
(1969) addressed the public relations
emphasis in the packaging of the “New
Nixon.” While Nixon won the presidency, he
took the country through the travail of the
Watergate scandal. In a media-conscious age,
there is still a need for presidents of character
and substance.
George H. Skau,
Emeritus
Bergen Community College
Paramus, New Jersey
Watergate: The Presidential Scandal That Shook
America.
By Keith W. Olson. (Lawrence: Uni-
versity Press of Kansas, 2003. x, 220 pp.
Cloth, $35.00,
ISBN
0-7006-1250-5. Paper,
$15.95,
ISBN
0-7006-1251-3.)
Richard Nixon, Watergate, and the Press: A His-
torical Retrospective.
By Louis W. Liebovich.
(Westport: Praeger, 2003. xvi, 143 pp. $45.95,
ISBN
0-275-97915-6.)
Don’t look now, but a new round of anniver-
saries, “revelations,” and books covering Rich-
ard M. Nixon’s last crisis has arrived. In 2003,
as news programs marked the thirtieth anni-
versary of the Senate’s probe of the Watergate
break-in, former Nixon aide Jeb Stuart
Magruder dropped a bombshell: the president
himself had ordered the break-in at the Dem-
ocratic National Committee headquarters.
Now, as the first presidential resignation in
United States history turns thirty, two studies
promise fresh insights into this national trag-
edy.
Keith W. Olson’s
Watergate
is the better of
the two books. It is succinct and lively and apt
to find its way into courses on U.S. history
since 1945. The author’s thesis is plain: eigh-
teen months of disclosures of White House
misconduct fostered a national consensus in
favor of Nixon’s removal from office. In other
words, no partisan cabal drove Nixon from the
presidency. This argument is conventional but
compelling, for Olson has plumbed an array
o
f
n
e
w
s
p
a
p
e
r
s
n
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
d
e
t
o
s
h
o
w
h
o
w
Nixon’s chief supporters had, by mid-1974,
turned against him. In short, as charges of a
presidential cover-up surfaced, Nixon lost
public support. His unwillingness to surren-
der the White House tapes, his firing of Spe-
cial Prosecutor Archibald Cox, and his belated
release of partial transcripts of the tapes disil-
lusioned and then undermined his political
base. Release of the “smoking gun” tape, the
conversation of June 23, 1972, during which
Nixon ordered his chief of staff, H. R. Halde-
man, to enlist the Central Intelligence Agency
in thwarting the investigation of Watergate,
delivered the
coup de grâce.
Republican leaders
such as Barry Goldwater and right-leaning
newspapers such as the
Chicago Tribune
had,
by August 1974, joined with the opposition
party and the nation in demanding that
Nixon vacate the White House.
I have two caveats about this part—the
bulk—of
Watergate.
First, although a consen-
sus that Nixon ought to leave office had
emerged by mid-1974, newspaper editorials
remained divided over whether resignation or
impeachment was the most appropriate means
for removing him. Second, explorations in the
papers of prominent Republicans such as
Goldwater, Senate Minority Leader Hugh
Scott, and House Minority Leader John J.
Rhodes would have revealed greater party loy-
alty than Olson suggests. Republican leaders
privately agonized over Watergate but resisted,
especially in Scott’s case, breaking with the
president in public.
Olson’s concluding chapter is his best, for it
explains, in a most thoughtful way, why Wa-
tergate happened. The author places the scan-
dal in the context of the Cold War, a time
when the U.S. government clamped down on
dissent at home and attempted to rig elections
overseas. Olson, trying to be as fair as possible,
shows Nixon to be a product of his age. And
he takes Attorney General John Mitchell and
others at their word when they claimed that
reelecting the president over an antiwar Dem-
ocrat was crucial to advancing the national in-
terest. Yet the Nixon team proved unwilling or
unable to acknowledge that electoral skulldug-
gery abroad was one thing; dirty tricks on the
b
y
g
u
e
s
t
o
n
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
3
,
2
0
1
1
j
a
h
.
o
x
f
o
r
d
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
s
.
o
r
g
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
  • Univers Univers
  • Ebooks Ebooks
  • Livres audio Livres audio
  • Presse Presse
  • Podcasts Podcasts
  • BD BD
  • Documents Documents