Orphan Works comment 0652

From: Roberta J. Morris To: Jule L. Sigall, Associate Register for Policy & International Affairs U.S. Copyright Office Washington, DC orphanworks@loc.gov Comments on Copyright Office's Notice of Inquiry Concerning ORPHAN WORKS (70 FR 3739, 1/26/05) Table of Contents 1. Why I Am Writing 2. Comments on Question 1- "Nature of the Problems Faced by Subsequent Creators and Users" 2.1 Anecdotal Information about Publishers of Academic Works 2.2. Professor-Authors and the Educational Community In General 2.3 Anecdotal Proof of Educators' Misconceptions about the Public Domain and Fair Use 2.3.1 An Informal Survey of Elementary School Educators 2.3.2 The Lore not the Law (among Law Professors) 3. Comments on Question 2 - "Nature of 'Orphan works': Identification and Designation" 3.1 What Information the Copyright Office Should Publish 3.2 Comments on the Canadian Program 4. Comments on Question 5 - "Effect of Work being Designated 'Orphaned'" 4.1 Standard for Reclaiming Orphan Works 4.2 Proceedings by Previously-Unlocatable Owners Against Infringing Users 4.3 Reasonable Royalty: What is Reasonable? 5. Future Discussions 5.1. Input from Major Research Universities 5.2 Requirements For Users: Attribution 5.3 Spawning Cottage Industries 20050325.1128 rjm 11. Why I Am Writing I have taught Copyright and other intellectual property courses at the ...