Beyond September 11 , livre ebook
268
pages
English
Ebooks
2002
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne En savoir plus
Découvre YouScribe et accède à tout notre catalogue !
Découvre YouScribe et accède à tout notre catalogue !
268
pages
English
Ebooks
2002
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne En savoir plus
Publié par
Date de parution
20 juin 2002
EAN13
9781849641708
Langue
English
Poids de l'ouvrage
1 Mo
The unprecedented and tragic events in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania left an indelible mark on world politics. Civilian deaths in horrific circumstances triggered an uncompromising response from the US administration and its allies: an open-ended 'war on terrorism'. This anthology includes some of the world's leading commentators - Noam Chomsky, Robert Fisk, Naomi Klein, John Pilger, Paul Foot and A.Sivanandan. It presents accessible, detailed and often deeply personal accounts of the aftermath, the bombing of Afghanistan and the dubious claims for its legality. From investigative journalists to critical academics, human rights lawyers and anti-racist campaigners, the contributors are united in their opposition to military intervention in Afghanistan and beyond and to the attack on civil liberties in the US, the UK and Europe. Examining the the context and rhetoric of US vengeance - ennobled by the symbolic title 'Enduring Freedom' - they challenge political and popular definitions, constructions,pathologisation and reporting of terrorism. In questioning the representation of war as 'just', the anthology focuses on civilian deaths in Afghanistan, evidence of US/allied atrocities, violations of prisoners' rights and US determination to escalate military offensives, regardless of global destabilisation.Preface1. Introduction: Witnessing ‘Terror’, Anticipating ‘War’ by Phil Scraton2. America’s Jihad: A History Of Origins by Christian Parenti3. An Unconscionable Threat To Humanity by John Pilger4. The Threat Of United States’ Ruthlessness by Madeleine Bunting5. ‘Terrorism’, ‘War’ And Democracy Compromised by Paul Foot6. The Politics Of Morality by Phil Scraton7. Representations Of Terror In The Legitimation Of War by Eileen Berrington8. ‘Either You Are With Us Or You Are With The Terrorists’: The War’s Home Front by Jude McCulloch9. Resistance And Terror: Lessons From Ireland by Bill Rolston10. September 11 Aftermath: Where Is The World Heading? by Noam Chomsky11. A Question Of State Crime by Penny Green 12. This War Was Illegal And Immoral, And It Won’t Prevent Terrorism by Michael Mandel13. Expanding The Concept Of Terrorism by Thomas Mathiesen14. Legislative Responses To Terrorism by Philip A Thomas15. All In The Name Of Security by Liz Fekete16. Airy Fairy Liberals And All That by Paddy Hillyard17. Poverty Is The New Black by A. Sivanandan18. The Challenge Of September 11: An Interview With A. Sivanandan19. The Policing Of Immigration In The New World Disorder by Leanne Weber and Ben Bowling20. September 11 And all That: An African Perspective by Tunde Zack Williams21. The Khaki Election by Russell Hogg22. Signs Of The Times by Naomi Klein23. Business As Usual? Corporate Moralism And The ‘War Against Terrorism’ by Dave Whyte24. Markets, Regulation And Risk: The US Airlines Industry And Some Fallout 25. From September 11 by Steve Tombs26. Dangers Of The Armed Response At Home by Mick North27. Terrorism, Neighbours And Nuremberg by Herman Schwendinger and Julia Schwendinger28. Pledging Allegiance: The Revival Of Prescriptive Patriotism by Cecilia O’Leary and Tony Platt29. My Fellow Americans: Looking Black On Red Tuesday by Jonathan David Farley30. Neither Pure Nor Vile by Mike Marqusee31. The Lion, The Witch And The Warmonger: ‘Good’, ‘Evil’ And The Shattering Of Imperial Myth by Howard Davis32. Beyond September 11: Certainties and Doubts by Barbara HudsonCould Osama Bin Laden Have Been A Woman? Masculinity And September 11 by Martti Grönfors33. An Attack On Truth? by Elizabeth Stanley34. My Beating By Refugees Is A Symbol Of The Hatred And Fury Of This Filthy War by Robert Fisk35. In The Name Of A ‘Just War’ by Phil Scraton
Voir
Publié par
Date de parution
20 juin 2002
EAN13
9781849641708
Langue
English
Poids de l'ouvrage
1 Mo
Irlande du Nord
11
9
Banque mondiale
Guerre contre le terrorisme
John Pilger
Paul Foot
General
Taliban
Noam Chomsky
Citizenship
Human rights
Northern Ireland
September 11
World Bank
Civil and political rights
International relations
General officer
Civics
Christian Parenti
Michael Mandel
AIDS
Yarl's Wood Immigration Removal Centre
Campaign Against Racism and Fascism
War on Terror
Irlanda del Norte
POLITICAL SCIENCE
Civil Rights
Beyond September 11
An Anthology of Dissent
Edited by Phil Scraton
P Pluto Press LONDON • STERLING, VIRGINIA
First published 2002 by Pluto Press 345 Archway Road, London N6 5AA and 22883 Quicksilver Drive, Sterling, VA 20166–2012, USA
www.plutobooks.com
Copyright © Phil Scraton 2002
The right of the individual contributors to be identified as the authors of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN 0 7453 1963 7 hardback ISBN 0 7453 1962 9 paperback
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Beyond September 11 : an anthology of dissent / edited by Phil Scraton. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0–7453–1963–7 –– ISBN 0–7453–1962–9 1. Terrorism. 2. War on Terrorism, 2001– 3. Government, Resistance to. I. Scraton, Phil. HV6431 .B495 2002 973.931––dc21 200200503
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
7
Designed and produced for Pluto Press by Chase Publishing Services, Fortescue, Sidmouth EX10 9QG Typeset from disk by Stanford DTP Services, Towcester Printed in the European Union by Antony Rowe, Chippenham, England
Contents
Acknowledgements Preface
Introduction: Witnessing ‘Terror’, Anticipating ‘War’ Phil Scraton
America’s Jihad: A History of Origins Christian Parenti
An Unconscionable Threat to Humanity John Pilger
The Threat of United States’ Ruthlessness Madeleine Bunting
‘Terrorism’, ‘War’ and Democracy Compromised Paul Foot
The Politics of Morality Phil Scraton
Representations of Terror in the Legitimation of War Eileen Berrington
‘Either You Are With Us or You Are With the Terrorists’: The War’s Home Front Jude McCulloch
Resistance and Terror: Lessons from Ireland Bill Rolston
September 11 Aftermath: Where is the World Heading? Noam Chomsky
A Question of State Crime? Penny Green
This War is Illegal and Immoral, and it Won’t Prevent Terrorism Michael Mandel
ix x
1
10
19
30
35
40
47
54
59
66
71
77
vi
Beyond September 11
Expanding the Concept of Terrorism? Thomas Mathiesen
Legislative Responses to Terrorism Philip A Thomas
All in the Name of Security Liz Fekete
In Defence of Civil Liberties Paddy Hillyard
Poverty is the New Black A Sivanandan
The Challenge of September 11: An Interview with A Sivanandan
The Policing of Immigration in the New World Disorder Leanne Weber and Ben Bowling
September 11 and All That: An African Perspective Tunde Zack-Williams
The Khaki Election Russell Hogg
Signs of the Times Naomi Klein
Business as Usual? Corporate Moralism and the ‘War Against Terrorism’ Dave Whyte
Markets, Regulation and Risk: The US Airlines Industry and Some Fallout from September 11 Steve Tombs
Dangers of the Armed Response at Home Mick North
Terrorism, Neighbours and Nuremberg Herman Schwendinger and Julia Schwendinger
Pledging Allegiance: The Revival of Prescriptive Patriotism Cecilia O’Leary and Tony Platt
84
93
102
107
113
118
123
130
135
143
150
157
162
168
173
My Fellow Americans: Looking Black on Red Tuesday Jonathan David Farley
Neither Pure Nor Vile Mike Marqusee
Contents
The Lion, the Witch and the Warmonger: ‘Good’, ‘Evil’ and the Shattering of Imperial Myth Howard Davis
Beyond September 11: Certainties and Doubts Barbara Hudson
Could Osama Bin Laden Have Been a Woman? Masculinity and September 11 Martti Grönfors
An Attack on Truth? Elizabeth Stanley
My Beating by Refugees is a Symbol of the Hatred and Fury of this Filthy War Robert Fisk
In the Name of a ‘Just War’ Phil Scraton
Notes on Contributors Index
vii
177
182
188
195
200
206
211
216
234 238
Acknowledgements
This anthology could not have been produced without the willing co-operation of the authors and their response to tight deadlines. Barbara Houghton has been central to the production of the book, not only in liaising with authors, word processing, reformatting text and responding to numerous requests to accommodate changes, but also in her patient support throughout. Colleagues at the Centre for Studies in Crime and Social Justice, as ever, have encouraged and contributed much to the realisation of the project. At Pluto Anne Beech and colleagues have been enthusiastic and responsive in ensuring speedy production. It is important to acknowledge formally: theGuardian, for contri-butions by Madeleine Bunting and Paul Foot; theNew Statesman, for contributions by John Pilger;The Nationfor the article by Naomi Klein;Race and Classfor A Sivanandan’s contributions; theInde-pendentfor Robert Fisk’s personal account. Each article is fully acknowledged and referenced in the text. Finally I could not have edited, and contributed to, this collection had it not been for the personal support and critical comments of my partner, Deena Haydon. My deepest thanks to her and to my friends and co-workers who have given so much over the last four months. Phil Scraton Merseyside February 2002
ix
Preface
So pervasive is the mass media that when dramatic, catastrophic events occur in Western societies, particularly the US, visual images are projected instantaneously on to a world stage. They are presented, indeed re-presented, to a global audience. This contrasts with the delayed or absent coverage of disasters and tragedies in the so-called Third World. By any standard, however, the magnitude and significance of September 11 was exceptional. Yet, like any trans-mitted event, meaning was constructed in the experiences of the beholder. While there could not be anything but incredulity, given the bold ferocity and appalling ‘success’ of the suicide mission, con-demnation was not universal. For many throughout the world there was deep sadness and open outrage at the loss of civilians through wilful acts of mass murder; for others they were a cause for celebra-tion. As those who hijacked and deployed domestic flights as bombs were condemned as terrorist killers, to others they were heroes who had sacrificed their lives in ultimate acts of heroism. This profound contrast in the responses of ordinary people across the globe could not, and cannot, be ignored. The graphic, horrifying images of the ‘bombing’ and eventual collapse of the World Trade Center’s twin towers left a lasting imprint on all who watched their repeated transmission. With powerful lenses, from close focus to wide angle, and with clear blue skies of late summer as the backdrop, not one moment of the disaster went unrecorded. This left an often voiced sense of unease that those who indulged in the coverage, as producers and as viewers, later felt they had been voyeurs. Yet the sheer scale of the disasters, in Manhattan, Washington and Pennsylvania demanded and received world attention. That, of course, had been a primary objective of the terrible mission. These were not casual targets. Inevitably, then, September 11 was portrayed as the day that ‘changed history’. After these events ‘life would never be the same’. Clearly that was, and remains, true for the bereaved, the survivors and the rescuers. Their lives and futures were altered suddenly and permanently; their hopes and plans devastated.
x
Preface
xi
To represent more broadly those fateful moments or hours as ‘world changing’ masked the realities of international relations and the powerful interests that underpin them. However vicious, uncom-promising and criminal, the attacks on the US were not without context. They were the end-product of historical, material circum-stances. If they are to be understood it is necessary to put aside simplistic mono-causal explanations. The political imperative is to move beyond indignation, condemnation and retribution and face the complex political, economic and socio-cultural relations between and within nation-states to understand and confront regimes which spawn such acts. Yet, to seek explanation is not to deny culpability. To understand through contextualisation is not to appease or justify despicable acts of extreme violence. To pursue justice through inter-national laws and conventions is not to betray the dead and their bereaved families. The events of September 11 shaped rather than changed contemporary history. If we fail to grasp material and social contexts, if we dismiss as irrelevant profound differences in their interpretation, we deny their meaning, neglect their significance and rationalise their truth. In the rush to judgement of the immediate aftermath, the ease with which a label – terrorism – emerged and was applied as a self-evident classification was disturbing, although hardly surprising. In the clamour for vengeance, the speed with which previously little-known individuals, groups and organisations were ascribed ‘monster’ status was remarkable. And, in the misappropriation of ‘justice’ as a non-negotiable process, the legitimacy claimed, if not coerced, for the deployment of the most powerful weaponry on earth was breath-taking. As the bereaved and survivors were still reeling from the full, personal impact of the attacks, the US demanded of its people, its allies and all nation-states, unqualified approval for its self-serving ‘war on terror’. The US alone decided on appropriate targets and its ‘with us or against us’ agenda condemned ‘neutrals’ to reclassifica-tion as ‘enemies of the States’. Yet, consistent with a kind of Orwellian double-speak, it was a war that was not a war, suggesting, and eventually demonstrating, that the US would be bound neither by the rules of engagement associated with military action nor by the Geneva Conventions. It was during the politics of the immediate aftermath, as the Bush agenda in the US transformed into the Blair agenda in the UK, that this anthology was conceived. As the destiny of Afghanistan’s torturing Taliban regime was sealed, with unrestrained US support
xii
Beyond September 11
given to the torturing Northern Alliance to fight the ground war, the full implications of the potential of sustained and unlimited military intervention began to dawn. Still there was no workable or agreed definition of ‘terrorism’. Neither was there any informed political debate on extending the ‘war’ in Afghanistan to other states. What qualified states for inclusion on the prescribed list of potential US targets? There was no political mandate for the ‘war on terror’ and no political accountability for prioritised targets or ‘collateral damage’. At the same time, new anti-terrorist legislation was rushed through and enacted in the US, the UK and Europe. Apart from draconian law reform, existing legislation was used with harsh authoritarianism. In schools, colleges and universities, critical and rights-oriented debate was silenced with dissenters intimidated physically and professionally. The myth of academic freedom, usually disguised by liberal rhetoric and a pretence that the academy stands apart from vested military-industrial interests, was exposed. What was deeply worrying about these developments was the ease with which opposition to the ‘war on terror’, in both political hubris and military action, was recast as betrayal. First a betrayal of those who died in Manhattan, Washington and Pennsylvania and second a betrayal of nationhood and ‘civilised values’. The worst excesses of this media-hyped response were seen in headlines branding opponents of the military strategy as ‘traitors’. Simultaneously, the ‘evil’ ascribed to Osama bin Laden, al-Qaida and the Taliban was transferred to Muslims living throughout the West, fuelling racism already endured by black and Asian communities. In this context of vengeance and despair, of propaganda and reaction, I contacted academics, journalists, lawyers, activists and campaigners inviting short, informed articles reflecting critical responses to the Bush-Blair agenda. The brief was to write personally and/or professionally. This anthology, containing eight already published articles and twenty-six commissioned contributions, is not intended as a comprehensive coverage of all issues. Rather, it sets out to provide an accessible and detailed account of the implications of the responses to September 11 and its aftermath. It blends well-researched and closely observed political accounts with personal experiences. What the collection achieves is a forum in which opposition to the ‘war on terror’, as constituted by President Bush in his September 2001 address to Congress and reaffirmed in his State of the Union speech in February 2002, has been voiced powerfully, authoritatively
Preface
xiii
and without compromise. This anthology of dissent reflects deep concerns from within the US and allied states. The contributors, indi-vidually and collectively, present a profound, shared concern with what has been, continues to be and will be carried out in our names.
Phil Scraton Merseyside February 2002
