IEEE P802.3af D4.0 All comment resolutions

P802.3af Draft 4.0 CommentsCl 33 SC 33.3.2.5 P 46 L 5 # Cl 33 SC 33.2.3.4 P 41 L 39 #1 3Karam, Roger CISCO Karam, Roger CISCOComment Type Comment Status Comment Type Comment Status smT A T ATable 33-2 Power_applied and Power_On are not well defined for theaverage software engineer with all respect to the S-Teamed editors...The PSE spec here has a Min of 2.8 and a Max of 10v and we do not so we propose a new language for the masses to understand as theyState in the table that this is the PD - loaded PSE voltage compliance. code and pray...SuggestedRemedy SuggestedRemedyAdd this note in the note filed to the right Well with Thank's to Yair I borrowed his proposed text:when loaded with a Valid PDhere is the test to replace line 34Proposed Response Response StatusCPOWER_APPLIED: Status (?) signal indicating that the PSE has Applied PowerACCEPT IN PRINCIPLE. but has no indication if the power is good or if it has reach steady state.with a Valid PD detection signature connectedhere is the text to replace line 40:Cl 33 SC 33.2.7 P 48 L #2Karam, Roger CISCO POWER ON: Status(?) Signal Indicating that the PSE has turned the power on and that the PSE has determined that steady state has been reached and things are inComment Type T Comment Status ANormal operation in the power state.We are missing the reason that would enforce the class-violationProposed Response Response Status CSo why would I make sure my ...