Public Comment Analysis

Public Comment AnalysisLetter Comment Response1 . Thanks for all the information; no further comments 3C2 . We do not feel that current livestock grazing is being over applied or mis app3Dlied. We have confidence that the Forest Service management plans will give positive direction to the application of grazing management as it relates to the Northern Goshawk. Current livestock grazing management plans do not appear to have negatively affected the Northern Goshawk. We ask that you allow the current grazing management plans to work in the management of the Northern Goshawk.3 . Feel that the alternatives which did not propose harvest of timber would not me 3D et healthy forest objectives.4 . Guideline implementation in spruce stands with ages of 200+ would be very 3Dsusceptible to spruce beetle. The alternative selected should allow prompt removal/salvage so that beetle problems can be managed efficiently and timely. Selected alternative needs to allow harvest and removal. Forest treatment is necessary to maintain/improve habitat. Those alternatives which do not manage vegetation lead to unacceptable consequences and do not meet poposral objectives.5 . ... the Forest Service should adopt Alternative F as the option best suited for 3Dconserving goshawk populations. This alternative has the added benefit of best benefiting sensitive, threatened, and endangered species associated with goshawk habitat. This alternative will be least likely to lead to ...