KELLY, C. A., AND J. W. M. RUDD. Reply to comment by Urban and Baker

14: 52: 1967. 188. 1988. 1987. 1. 4: L. 18. 43: 1988. 39: 1986. 29 44: 31: 31: 30: 1974. 1986. 160: 1987. In 1982. 1985. 1988. 1982. 128 134-148. M. M. Sulfur of 1196-1207. W., W. SWANK. of from forest 529-536. M., M. of sulfur of 1406-1412. M. Incor- of of 85-95. W., 40-85. F., W. of sulfur 188-193. M. F. of sulfur iron of 33-45. 1179-I A. of of soft W.,C. 97-l of KELLY, W. M. of sulfur of of We mea- of budgets from calculated duction on based production alkalinity of timation pro- alkalinity with well agreed budgets ion underes- to leads 1989) Baker and Urban from calculated production alkalinity lake in as (equations 4 equation than rather 2 whole- that found who (1986) al. et Schindler equation of use and formed ester sulfate per produced alkalinity of equivalent 1 of tion and (1986) al. et Cook by situ in checked been has approach This budget. ion complete assump- the that state budgets-They Zon reasons. following the for statements the in for accounted be will movements cation base associated any of effect the and both with disagree lakes. in mation charges, negative two of loss a as counted for- ester-sulfate of extent the of estimation always is ion sulfate a of loss A (1986). al. under- an be will there that Second, budgets. et Baker and (1986) al. et Cook by scribed ion by production alkalinity of culation cal- incorrect an be will there that contend de- as anions acid and cations base all ...