-
21
pages
-
English
-
Documents
Description
INCREMENTAL RECYCLED WATER PROGRAM FINAL EIR RESPONSE TO COMMENTS COMMENT LETTER 202, JOHN SHORT, SENIOR WATER RESOURCE ENGINEER, CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD Response to Comment 202-1 Comment Summary: The comment expresses gratitude at the opportunity to comment and finds the Draft EIR to be thorough. The City appreciates the comments. Response to Comment 202-2 Comment Summary: The comment expresses support for the City’s decision to study all reasonable means of dealing with future flow increases. The City appreciates the support of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Response to Comment 202-3 Comment Summary: The comment supports use of a combination of treatment/disposal alternatives. oard. Response to Comment 202-4 Comment Summary: The comment requests that first consideration be given to enhanced water conservation and infiltration and inflow prevention. Please refer to Master Response A – Statements of Opinion for or against a Project Alternative or Component. Response to Comment 202-5 Comment Summary: The comment expresses support for beneficial reuse alternatives such as injection into the Geysers steamfield and agriculture and urban reuse. Please refer to Master Response A – Statements of Opinion for or against a Project Alternative or Component. Response to Comment 202-6 Comment Summary: The comment states that if alternatives involving discharge to ground or surface waters are chosen, the Board ...
-
Publié par
-
Langue
English