COMMENT FROM PEER REVIEWERS

SAP 3.4 Public Comment Table Lister of public Reviewers: #1 Raúl Samayoa, Tegucigalpa, Honduras #2 Thomas Cronin, USGS #3 Debra Willard, USGS #4 Samuel P. Williamson, NOAA/OFCM #5 Eric Swanson, Warrensville, NC #6 Michael C. MacCracken, Climate Institute #7 NOAA Research Council Note: Page and line numbers associated with public comments in this table refer to the Public review draft.SAP 3.4 Public Review Comments - Combined 10/7/2008 Page 1 Comment from Peer Reviewers Author’s Response Comment Text Notes on Response General Comments Reviewer #1 The report is a very good work however Where the report discusses evidence I may do just comment of past climate change, it clearly identifies changes that may be 1-1 Gen As a final conclusion I will recommend X associated with changes in the solar to concentrate more on the Sun and their forcing. effects on the climate in the long run in the Planet Earth. Plus other 2 items: 1. According to studies made some Correct – this comment refers to an time ago and base on studies of interval long before the influence of more than 400,000 year, the humans, when the variations in 1-2 Gen X temperature cycles and CO2 in climate and CO2 were associated the air go by cycles as the day with natural variability. The report and night, only in cycles of more makes clear distinctions in SAP 3.4 Public Review Comments - Combined 10/7/2008 Page 2 ...