Employer BenchMark Survey results -netconference3

„„„„„„„„Results from 2007 Employer TDM Program Benchmarking Survey Philip L. WintersCenter for Urban Transportation ResearchUniversity of South FloridaOn behalf of the ACT Employer CouncilTom Davis and Jennifer Paedon, co-chairsOverviewBackground and methodologyEmployer structure – purpose, performance measuresProgram elementsPrograms and amenitiesParkingERHSubsidiesObservations1„„„Background and MethodologyACT Employer Council and NCTR partnered to develop benchmarking information on employer commute programsEmail to all ACT membersSome ACT members forwarded to employersSurvey RespondentsNumber of Workplaces Number of Workplaces Employer Size100 - 250 - 500 - 1,000 - 5,000 -Industry <=99 >=10,000 Total249 499 999 4,999 9,999Utilities - - - - 2 - - 2Manufacturing - - - - - 1 2 3Retail Trade - - - 1 1 1 - 3Transportation and Warehousing - 1 - 2 - - - 3Information - - - - - - 2 2Finance and Insurance - - - - 2 - - 2Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 4 - - - - 1 1 6Educational Services - - - 1 3 3 9 16Health Care and Social Assistance - - 1 1 - - 1 3Other Services (except Public Administration) - - - 1 1 1 - 3Public Administration 1 2 2 1 5 - - 11Total 5 3 3 7 14 7 15 542Employee Commute Program PurposeNumber of WorkplacesVery Employee Commute Program Purpose To Some A Small Not Great Extent Extent At AllExtentMeeting with local or state regulations for trip reduction 35 8 1 9or growth ...