P802.16e D5 Comment Resolutions

2005/02/17 IEEE 802.16-05/0100000754P802.16e/D5Document under Review: Ballot Number:Comment Date0016 Richard Pace Member 2004-11-04Comment # Comment submitted by:2 16 1.3.4Technical, BindingComment Type Starting Page # Starting Line # Fig/Table# SectionIn Table 1, the options for the OFDMA PHY are understated. Several options should be added. For example, HARQ is not listed as a separateoption but carries an alternate stack. There are a number of different FFT sizes but these are not listed. Also there a significant number of subtleoptions that should be discussed. For example, the alternate permutations for the Fully Used Subchannelization (FUSC) and Partially UsedSubchannelization (PUSC) should be called out.Suggested RemedyDevelop a more comprehensive options table or linkage to an additional table with more information.Decision of Group:Resolution of Group Accepted-Modified(1) Add definitions of PUSC and FUSC to Clause 3.(2) Add abbreviations PUSC and FUSC to Clause 4.Reason for Group's Decision/ResolutionOriginally rejected for lack of specific text, during comment resolution Roger Marks submitted a follow up comment to partially address this, which wasaccepted. The group noted that abbreviations and definitions for PUSC and FUSC can be found on page 500 of IEEE Std 802.16-2004 in theparagraph following Figure 218, but are more properly to be included in the sections identified by the editor.2005/02/17 IEEE 802.16-05 ...