IEEE P802.3ae D2.1 Comment Resolution

P802.3ae Draft 2.1 CommentsCl SC P L Cl SC P L00 # 33 00 00 # 664Stoltz, Mario ChipIng.de, an Intel co William G. Lane CSU, ChicoComment Type E Comment Status R Comment Type E Comment Status RMixed usage of "baud" (20 occurrences) and "b/s" (many, many more) in the draft does not There is a general inconsistency in the way clock frequencies and transmission rates are seem to follow any plan. specified in the various clauses, including for example:SuggestedRemedyClause 46Replace all "bauds" with "b/s" unless there actually WAS a plan that simply escaped the 9.58 Gb/s STS-192 payload rate (see 46.1.3), commentor's limited viewfield. 156.25 MHz+/-0.01% (46.3.1.1 -- TX_CLK at the XGMII), nominally 156.25 MHz (46.3.2.1 - RX_CLK at the XGMII), Proposed Response Response Status CREJECT. Clause 47nominal rate of 3.125 Gbaud (47.1.3)There are cases where baud and b/s do imply different things. The editor respectfully requests 3.125 Gbaud +/-100ppm (47.3.3)that the commenter re-submit a comment in the next ballot period that indicates where this wording should be changed. Clause 48Cl 00 SC P L 48 # 507312.5 MHz +/-100 ppm (48.3.1.1)Law, David J 3Com nominal rate of 312.5 MHz ( 100 ppm, as governed by frequency and tolerance of XGMII TX_CLK (48.3.2.1.2)Comment Type E Comment Status AThe address for the IEEE on the front sheet is incorrect Clause 49644.53 Mtransfers/s and 599.04 Mtransfers/s (49.1.5)SuggestedRemedyPlease correct the address to read:-Clause ...