District Comparison of Benchmark Status Math

Comparison of Benchmark/CIM Status - Whole Group2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08 READINGDistrict Report2005-06 Benchmark Status 2006-07 Benchmark Status 2007-08 Benchmark StatusGradeExceeds Meets Near Low Very Low Total Exceeds Meets Near Low Very Low Total Exceeds Meets Near Low Very Low TotalGrade 3 N 1679 1327 171 107 43 3327 1341 1468 224 246 63 3342 1522 1393 190 217 55 3377% 50% 40% 5% 3% 1% 100% 40% 44% 7% 7% 2% 100% 45% 41% 6% 6% 2% 100%Grade 4 N 1387 1655 163 115 53 3373 1373 1341 317 194 71 3296 1545 1300 241 188 45 3319% 41% 49% 5% 3% 2% 100% 42% 41% 10% 6% 2% 100% 47% 39% 7% 6% 1% 100%Grade 5 N 1037 1813 272 168 71 3361 942 1485 536 275 66 3304 1050 1444 499 205 50 3248% 31% 54% 8% 5% 2% 100% 29% 45% 16% 8% 2% 100% 32% 44% 15% 6% 2% 100%Grade 6 N 1115 1412 221 281 32 3061 1028 1503 436 211 66 3244 1143 1412 460 181 32 3228% 36% 46% 7% 9% 1% 100% 32% 46% 13% 7% 2% 100% 35% 44% 14% 6% 1% 100%Grade 7 N 1515 1089 424 216 37 3281 1134 1286 412 163 24 3019 1238 1339 500 148 10 3235% 46% 33% 13% 7% 1% 100% 38% 43% 14% 5% 1% 100% 38% 41% 15% 5% 0% 100%Grade 8 N 1211 1114 565 320 41 3251 853 1561 396 350 79 3239 942 1205 511 286 38 2982% 37% 34% 17% 10% 1% 100% 26% 48% 12% 11% 2% 100% 32% 40% 17% 10% 1% 100%Grade 10 N 613 1111 778 545 80 3127 623 1319 401 621 50 3014 561 1338 406 569 36 2910% 20% 36% 25% 17% 3% 100% 21% 44% 13% 21% 2% 100% 19% 46% 14% 20% 1% 100%Achievement standards (cut scores) changed in the 2006-07 school year. It became harder ...