Consultation statistique avec le logiciel

Consultation statistique avec le logiciel Why Muto & Osawa (1987) plot is not good? J.R. Lobry 14 mars 2006 Professor Alexander N. Gorban asked me by e-mail on Sun, 23 Oct 2005 14:00:17 +0100 for the following legitimate clarification: About your third remark: ”As pointed by Sueoka (in 1988 IIRC) the Muto & Osawa representation is very bad be- cause the x-axis and y-axis variables are not independent...” From my point of view, here we meet one of the standard misunderstanding of the ”independency” notion. Because we touch this point third time, could you, please, give the definition of independency that you with Sueoka use here. In the standard sense all the variables we are talking about are not independent. I will try here to make this important point clear in a reproducible way. Table des matieres 1 Muto & Osawa (1987) plot 3 2 Sueoka's (1988) critics 3 3 Simulation 4 3.1 G+C content in coding sequences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.2 G+C content in intergenic spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.3 CDS versus intergenic spaces .

• citation rate


• science citation


• consultation statistique avec le logiciel


• coding sequences


• professor alexander


• cds versus intergenic spaces


• sueoka


• noboru sueoka wrote