Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program, Proposed Chemical Selection Approach for Initial Round of Screening;

Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 250/Monday, December 30, 2002/Notices 79611(EPD) to Shaw Industries, Inc.—Plant On November 15, 2002, the and, as appropriate, to object to No. 80 (Shaw) located in Dalton, Administrator issued an order denying operating permits proposed by state Whitfield County, Georgia. This order this petition. The order explains the permitting authorities under title V of constitutes final action on the petition reasons behind EPA’s conclusion that the Act, 42 U.S.C. 7661–7661f. Section submitted by the Georgia Center for Law the Petitioner has failed to demonstrate 505(b)(2) of the Act and 40 CFR 70.8(d) in the Public Interest (GCLPI) on behalf that the Shaw permit is not in authorize any person to petition the of Georgia Forest Watch (Petitioner). compliance with the requirements of the EPA Administrator to object to a title V Pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the Act on the grounds raised. operating permit within 60 days after Clean Air Act (the Act) any person may the expiration of EPA’s 45-day review Dated: December 6, 2002. seek judicial review in the United States period if EPA has not objected on its A. Stanley Meiburg, Court of Appeals for the appropriate own initiative. Petitions must be based Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 4.circuit within 60 days of this notice only on objections to the permit that [FR Doc. 02–32905 Filed 12–27–02; 8:45 am] under section 307 of the Act. were raised with reasonable specificity BILLING ...