-
4
pages
-
English
-
Documents
Description
DISTRICT REPORTComparison of Benchmark/CIM Status by Ethnic Group - Whole GroupREADING 2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-082005-06 Benchmark Status 2006-07 Benchmark Status 2007-08 Benchmark StatusGrade and Ethnic Group Exceeds Meets Near Low Very Low Total Exceeds Meets Near Low Very Low Total Exceeds Meets Near Low Very Low TotalGrade 3 N 21 37 4 7 0 69 17 31 7 6 0 61 18 28 0 4 1 51 American Indian/Alaskan Native % 30% 54% 6% 10% 0% 28% 51% 11% 10% 0% 35% 55% 0% 8% 2%N 159 178 22 17 8 384 127 168 21 27 5 348 126 168 20 29 4 347 Asian / Pacific Islander % 41% 46% 6% 4% 2% 36% 48% 6% 8% 1% 36% 48% 6% 8% 1%N 175 295 32 21 8 531 122 268 58 66 18 532 123 278 45 68 13 527 Black (Not of Hispanic Origin) % 33% 56% 6% 4% 2% 23% 50% 11% 12% 3% 23% 53% 9% 13% 2%N 122 256 46 34 14 472 74 256 60 80 17 487 106 273 67 49 17 512 Hispanic % 26% 54% 10% 7% 3% 15% 53% 12% 16% 3% 21% 53% 13% 10% 3%N 1189 553 67 28 13 1850 972 729 75 64 23 1863 1084 586 55 59 17 1801 White (Not of Hispanic Origin) % 64% 30% 4% 2% 1% 52% 39% 4% 3% 1% 60% 33% 3% 3% 1%N 42 37 2 7 1 89Multi-Ethnic % 47% 42% 2% 8% 1%N 13800 0 21 29 16 3 3 0 51 23 23 1 1 2 50Unknown / Unspecified % 62% 38% 0% 0% 0% 57% 31% 6% 6% 0% 46% 46% 2% 2% 4%Grade 4 N 18 41 3 3 1 66 12 38 6 7 1 64 14 27 4 5 1 51 American Indian/Alaskan Native % 27% 62% 5% 5% 2% 19% 59% 9% 11% 2% 27% 53% 8% 10% 2%N 127 204 18 19 3 371 126 187 46 27 5 391 146 146 38 14 4 348 Asian / Pacific Islander % 34% 55% 5% 5% 1% 32% 48% 12% 7% 1% 42% ...
-
Publié par
-
Langue
English