Directory of World Cinema: Iran 2
440 pages
English

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris

Directory of World Cinema: Iran 2 , livre ebook

Découvre YouScribe en t'inscrivant gratuitement

Je m'inscris
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus
440 pages
English
Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne
En savoir plus

Description

Created at the intersection of religion and ever-shifting political, economic, and social environments, Iranian cinema produces some of the most critically lauded films in the world today. The first volume of the Directory of World Cinema: Iran turned the spotlight on the award-winning cinema of Iran, with particular attention to the major genres and movements, historical turning points, and prominent figures that have helped shape it. Considering a wide range of genres, including Film Farsi, new wave, war film, art house film, and women’s cinema, the book was greeted with enthusiasm by film studies scholars, students working on alternative or national cinema, and fans and aficionados of Iranian film.

Building on the momentum and influence of its predecessor, Directory of World Cinema: Iran 2 will be welcomed by all seeking an up-to-date and comprehensive guide to Iranian cinema.

Praise for the first volume

“Successfully maps the long history of creativity, intellectualism and imagination of Iran. This book makes an important contribution to the area of Iranian cinema and film and is recommended to those who want to know more about Iran and its extraordinary cinema.”—Arezou Zalipour, Media International Australia

Introduction by the Editor 


Film of the Year: The Last Step/Pele-ye Akhar


Spotlight

Tales Is My Will and Testament: Interview with Rakhshan Bani-Etemad


Directors

Farrokh Ghaffari

Bahram Baizai

Sohrab Shahid-Sales

Amir Naderi

Rakhshan Bani-Etemad

Majid Majidi

Asghar Farhadi


Documentary Tradition


Contemporary Social Drama


Crime Thriller


Iranian Animation


Iranian Comedies


Political Films


Underground Films


Diasporic Cinema 


The Image of Women


 

Sujets

Informations

Publié par
Date de parution 01 mars 2017
Nombre de lectures 3
EAN13 9781783204717
Langue English
Poids de l'ouvrage 7 Mo

Informations légales : prix de location à la page 0,2800€. Cette information est donnée uniquement à titre indicatif conformément à la législation en vigueur.

Extrait

DIRECTORY OF WORLDCINEMA
EDITED BY PARVIZ JAHED
IRAN2
Volume 35
dIrectory of worLd cInema Iran 2
Edîted by Parvîz Jahed
intellect Brîsto, UK / Chîcago, USA
Fîrst pubîshed în the UK în 2017 by Inteect Books, The Mî, Parna Road, Fîshponds, Brîsto, BS16 3JG, UK
Fîrst pubîshed în the USA în 2017 by Inteect Books, The Unîversîty of Chîcago Press, 1427 E. 60th Street, Chîcago, IL 60637, USA
Copyrîght © 2017 Inteect Ltd
A rîghts reserved. No part of thîs pubîcatîon may be reproduced, stored în a retrîeva system, or transmîtted, în any form or by any means, eectronîc, mechanîca, photocopyîng, recordîng, or otherwîse, wîthout wrîtten permîssîon.
A cataogue record for thîs book îs avaîabe from the Brîtîsh Lîbrary.
Pubîsher: May Yao Pubîshîng Managers: Jeena Stanovnîk & Matt Greenied
Cover photograph:The Last Step(Aî Mosaffa, 2012). Road Movîe Productîons Copy-edîtor: Emma Rhys Cover desîgner: Emîy Dunn Typesetter: John Teehan
Dîrectory of Word Cînema ISSN 2040-7971 Dîrectory of Word Cînema eISSN 2040-798X
Dîrectory of Word Cînema: Iran 2 ISBN 978-1-78320-470-0 Dîrectory of Word Cînema: Iran 2 ePDF ISBN 978-1-78320-471-7
Prînted and bound by Short Run Press, UK.
Thîs îs a peer-revîewed pubîcatîon.
contents
dIrectory of worLd cInema Iran 2
aCKNOWEDgEMENTS
INTRODuCTîON BY THE eDîTOR
5
6
fîM OF THE yEàR 12 The Last Step/Pee-ye Akhar
spOTîgHT TaesIs My Wî and Testament: Intervîew wîth Rakhshan Banî-Etemad
dîRECTORS Farrokh Ghaffarî Bahram Baîzaî Sohrab Shahîd-Saes Amîr Naderî Rakhshan Banî-Etemad Majîd Majîdî Asghar Farhadî
dOCuMENTàRY tRàDîTîON Essays Revîews
cONTEMpORàRY sOCîà dRàMà Essay Revîews
cRîME tHRîER Essay Revîews
17
24
86
132
176
IRàNîàN cOMEDîES Essay Revîews
POîTîCà fîMS Essay Revîews
UNDERgROuND fîMS Essay Revîews
dîàSpORîC cîNEMà Essays Revîews
tHE IMàgE OF wOMEN Essay Revîews
rECOMMENDED rEàDîNg
IRàNîàN cîNEMà oNîNE
262
296
326
352
384
424
428
nOTES ON cONTRîBuTORS 431
fîMOgRàpHY
436
IRàNîàN aNîMàTîON 228 Essay Revîews contents
Dîrectory of Word Cînema
acknowLedGements
Dîrectory of Word Cînema
Thîs voume îs beîng pubîshed at a tîme when Masoud Yazdanî, the founder and pubîsher of Inteect, has passed on and eft us în deep sorrow and agony. He was a truy remarkabe man wîth a deep passîon for, and commîtment to im, and the study of ît. Though ît îs most regrettabe that Masoud was not abe to see thîs book’s reease before hîs untîmey passîng, I can ony hope that the outcome în some way relects the dedîcatîon and enthusîasm he had, for Iranîan cînema în partîcuar. Hîs encouragement and the unforgettabe kîndness he has shown me are the reasons thîs whoe project was ever possîbe. I can thînk of no better way to show our gratîtude to hîm than for everyone at Inteect, and a those who shared Masoud’s enthusîasm for thîs art form and thîs wonderfu project, to contînue hîs efforts and keep hîs spîrît aîve în our work as we as în our hearts and mînds. I’d îke to express my gratîtude to every author who has contrîbuted to thîs voume; undeterred by theîr busy schedues and engagements, a have strîved to produce thoughtfu and însîghtfu wrîtîng whîch I am proud to present în thîs voume. I’d aso extend my sîncere gratîtude to Emma Rhys for her consîderate and dîîgent edîtîng and support. I woud aso îke to thank my son, Barbod Jahed, for hîs învauabe work în transatîng the artîces from theîr orîgîna Persîan înto Engîsh and hîs edîtîng of other artîces and transatîons. Fînay, I woud îke to thank Matt Greenied and Jeena Stanovnîk, the Productîon Edîtors, and Heather Gîbson, the former Productîon Edîtor at Inteect for theîr exceent support and encouragement.
Acknowedgements5 acknowLedGements
Dîrectory of Word Cînema
6Iran 2
IntrodUctIon by the edItor
The irst voume of theDîrectory ofWord Cînema: Iranturned the spotîght onto Iranîan cînema, wîth our attentîon permeatîng through îts major movements, genres, hîstorîca turnîng poînts and promînent igures that have heped to deine and characterîze ît. Buîdîng upon the momentum of îts predecessor,Dîrectory of Word Cînema: Iran 2îs bound to be wecomed by a seekîng an up-to-date and extensîve guîde to Iranîan cînema. In the second voume, the scope has been broadened to contaîn the genres of poîtîca cînema, socîa drama, comedy, crîme thrîer, anîmatîon im, documentary im, underground cînema, the îmage of women and dîasporîc im, some of whîch have mosty remaîned underexpored în the Engîsh anguage texts hîtherto. In order to buîd a fuer îmage and be abe to characterîze Iranîan cînema, thîs book trîes to map out the obscure and uncharted corners of thîs cînema, and expound the sîgnîicance of these im styes, trends, genres and creatîve voîces. Ony a short whîe after the pubîcatîon of the ast voume, a number of pîvota events occurred wîthîn Iranîan cînema. Most notaby, Asghar Farhadî’s (whose im Darbare Ey/About Ey[2009] was hîghîghted în the irst voume)Jodaeî-ye Nader az Sîmîn/A Separatîon(2011) won the 2012 Oscar for Best Foreîgn Language Fîm. A irst for an Iranîan im, ît was aso nomînated for Best Orîgîna Screenpay. A Separatîonîs a powerfu dramatîc pîece relectîng on the conlîcts of a mîdde-cass famîy în Iran wîth a fresh approach and stye. The im was met wîth unîversa accaîm by im crîtîcs around the word, whîst markîng a departure from the quîet and uneventfu word of Kîarostamî or the more exotîc ims of Bahman Ghobadî, Majîd Majîdî and Abofaz Jaîî, who had prevîousy garnered crîtîca attentîon on an înternatîona scae. A type of naturaîstîc socîa drama, thîs major genre of Iranîan cînema îs dîscussed în detaî în Aî Moosavî’s artîce în thîs voume, as are îts we-known practîtîoners în Iranîan cînema, such as Jafar Panahî and Rakhshan Banî-Etemad and Kîanoush Ayarî. Despîte the current inancîa crîsîs and ever-present state-împosed restrîctîons and obstaces, cînema remaîns a thrîvîng commercîa- and cuturay sîgnîicant îndustry însîde the country. A im îkeA Separatîonîs stî abe to reach a arge audîence în Iran. It was a crîtîca and inancîa trîumph for Iranîan îndependent cînema but, as îs often the unfortunate case, ît was not acknowedged by the Iranîan im authorîtîes. Havîng found îts socîa-crîtîcîsm content too subversîve, the im was amost brought to a hat durîng productîon, wîth Farhadî havîng to negotîate wîth the state to remove the ban împosed on hîs im-makîng. He and im-makers îke hîm are hîghy tactfu în theîr handîng of state contro over theîr work, and capabe of usîng a varîety of toos and strategîes avaîabe to them to cîrcumvent censorshîp wîthout dîmînîshîng the overa themes, messages or styîstîc merîts of the ina output. Nevertheess, thîs frustratîng process eft Farhadî exhausted by im-makîng în Iran and, wîth the support of French productîon company MK2, he moved to France to make hîs next im.Le Passé/The Past(2013), starrîng Bérénîce Bejo, Tahar Rahîm and
Dîrectory of Word Cînema
Aî Mossaffa, was a contender for the Pame d’Or at the 2013 Cannes Fîm Festîva. Bérénîce Bejo won the Best Actress Award at Cannes for her performance în the im. In 2007, Darîush Mehrjuî’s imSantourî(2007) – awarded wîth the Audîence Choîce Prîze at the Fajr Fîm Festîva of that year – was banned from pubîc screenîng by the Mînîster of Cuture and Isamîc Guîdance Saffar Harandî. Thîs move was îndîcatîve of thîngs to come under the presîdency of Mahmoud Ahmadînejad. Mahmoud Ahmadînejad’s eîght-year reîgn saw red înes abound, wîth a surge of censorshîp, bans, pressure and restrîctîons paced upon im-makers reachîng a dîsîusîonîng eve. Meanwhîe, state-supported arge-scae projects, wîth reîgîous and patrîotîc motîfs – known asCînema-ye Fakher(îteray transated as ‘Subîme Cînema’) – were beîng made at an ampîied rate. These productîons range from epîcs that depîcted the hîstory of ancîent Isamîc igures, such as Majîd Majîdî’sMohammad(2015) and Ahmad Reza Darvîsh’sRastakhîz/Husseîn Who Saîd No(2014), to ims about the Iran–Iraq War whîch gorîfy the îdea of martyrdom and mythoogîze the sodîers. After the 2009 notorîous presîdentîa eectîon, whîst eadîng im-makers such as Jafar Panahî or Mohammad Rasouof had been prohîbîted from makîng ims, Ahmadînejad’s government supported the makîng of bîg-budget propaganda ims, such asGhaadeh-haye Taa/The Goden Coars(2012) by Aboghasem Taebî, to grant îtsef the îcence to re-înterpret the poîtîca events and the Green Movement (Jonbesh Sabz) that occurred after the eectîons. In December 2011, Khaneh Cînema (House of Fîm), a natîona guîd for im-makers and others învoved în the productîon, dîstrîbutîon and screenîng stage, had îts doors forced shut and Sazeman-e Cînemayee (Cînema Organîzatîon), a repacement body for Cînema Affaîrs of the Mînîstry of Cuture and Isamîc Guîdance, was put up by the state to take îts pace and enabe them to pace further contros upon the îndustry. The sîtuatîon was ookîng ever beaker for îndependent im-makers. In 2013, wîth the eectîon of Hassan Rohanî, a more moderate cerîc, came efforts în the rîght dîrectîon to create a reatîvey more open atmosphere. Among hîs irst decrees was the reopenîng of Khaneh Cînema, and the screenîng of ims such as Rakhshan Banî-Etemad’sGheseha/Taes(2014) and Kîanoush Ayarî’sKhane Pedarî/ Paterna House(2012), both of whîch had been banned under Ahmadînejad. Thîs heped restore some hope and more workabe reatîons between im-makers and the country. Some of those who had been forced to put theîr crafts asîde were învîted to recommence, athough certaîn im-makers îke Jafar Panahî and Mohammad Rasouof are stî egay banned from theîr practîce. Yet Panahî proved hîmsef undeterred yet agaîn, makîng another sef-portraya entîtedTaxî Tehran(2015) – the im îs contaîned wîthîn a taxî, drîven by hîmsef as he înteracts wîth passengers – and he sent ît to the Berîn Fîm Festîva and secured the Goden Bear. Lîke hîs prevîous endeavour, thîs was a im essay crîtîca of hîs own sîtuatîon and the socîeta condîtîons of modern Iran and of censorshîp.
Introductîon7
Dîrectory of Word Cînema
8Iran 2
Naturay, such actîons do not sît we wîth some of the hardîners who are tryîng theîr utmost to restore the prevîous state’s restrîctîons and are obbyîng agaînst certaîn poîcîes and ims. They want to revert the gradua easîng of pressure and see a return to the worst days of post-revoutîonary contro. In thîs ater perîod, we saw a reductîon of ims beîng made în certaîn genres, such as crîme cînema, and a compete dîssoutîon of other genres and trends such as Fîm Farsî (încudîng genres such as ‘Jaheî’, the rura meodrama, and the îke), whîst both fresh and famîîar genres such as poîtîca, war, romance and socîa dramas and experîmenta ims took hod on a grand scae. So whîe the irst voume of the dîrectory deat prîmarîy wîth the pre-revoutîonary genres and trends în Iranîan cînema, în the second voume we draw our attentîon to post-revoutîonary cînema, ookîng maîny at the most recent productîons by the newy emerged and young generatîon of Iranîan im-makers, such as Aî Mosaffa, Majîd Barzegar, Abdoreza Kahanî, Mohammad Rasouof, Reza Dormîshîan, Shahram Mokrî and Nîkî Karîmî, who has made a transîtîon to ow-budget, îndependent ims after her engthy, successfu career as a im star în Iranîan cînema. And, as îs aways the case, our contrîbutors consîst of a range of oca and înternatîona im schoars, researchers and crîtîcs who are a passîonatey famîîar wîth Iranîan cînema, îts mechanîsms of im productîon and îts codes of practîce. The maînstream îs covered wîth the same attentîon to detaî as the arthouse, and the domestîc and goba receptîon are encompassed. In hîs artîce on the poîtîca genre în Iranîan cînema, Saeed Zeydabadî-Nejad deves înto the reatîonshîp between poîtîcs and cînema. Specîicay, on how the two înternatîonay known îndependent im-makers, Abbas Kîarostamî and Mohsen Makhmabaf, manage to work wîthîn the system and overcome government-împosed hurdes. Zeydabadî-Nejad refers to responses gîven by these two im-makers at întervîews and Q&A sessîons durîng screenîngs of theîr ims abroad. Fîms deaîng overty wîth poîtîcs were quîte uncommon before the Isamîc Revoutîon, due to the heavy poîtîca censorshîp of the Shah. Apart from the poîtîca messages contaîned wîthîn New Wave ims, whîch were deîvered împîcîty, we can hardy ind any poîtîca ims în pre-revoutîonary Iranîan cînema. Fîms such as Asrar-e Ganj-e Darre-ye Jennî/The Secrets of the Treasure of the JînnVaey(Ebrahîm Goestan, 1974),Saye-h Haye Boand-e Baad/The Ta Shadows of the Wînd(Bahman Farmanara, 1978),OK Mîster(Parvîz Kîmîavî, 1979),Gavaznha/The Deer(Masoud Kîmîaî, 1973) andAramesh Dar Hozor-e Dîgaran/The Tranquîîty în the Presence of Others(Naser Taghvaeî, 1968) that addressed poîtîca îssues în Iran were banned or heavîy censored by the Shah’s government. After the revoutîon, the poîtîca sîtuatîon and overa sentîment wîthîn socîety aowed for such ims to take hod. Every im-maker who wanted to make ims about the prevîous regîme and îts suppressîve system was supported by the new revoutîonary government yet, save for a few exceptîons –Khat-e Ghermez/The Red Lîne(Masoud Kîmîaî, 1982),Ashbah/The Ghosts(Reza Mîrouhî, 1982) andNoghte-ye Zaaf/Weak Poînt(Mohammad Reza Aamî, 1982) – most of these productîons were supericîa and fu of poîtîca rhetorîc agaînst the Shah and hîs secret poîce (SAVAK), and în favour of the new government în keepîng wîth the poîtîca cîmate whîch had yet to take îts true form. Wîth the estabîshment of the Isamîc government and the împosîtîon of new measures of censorshîp, ît was too dîficut for im-makers to address poîtîca matters and chaenge the poîtîca status quo în Iran în theîr ims. A poîtîca im such as Mohsen Makhmabaf’sShab Haye Zayandeh Rood/The Nîghts of Zayandeh Rood(1991) woud be banned and the dîrector forced înto exîe. Others îke Mohammad Rasouof who chose to remaîn în Iran were împrîsoned or had theîr passports
Dîrectory of Word Cînema
coniscated. In a socîety where freedom of expressîon îs under extreme pressure and crîtîcîsm of the prevaîîng power woud gravey endanger the person crîtîcîzîng, no producer woud be wîîng to take on the rîsk of addressîng such sensîtîve, crîtîca îssues. Even the prîvate im companîes whîch beneit from state resources tend not to seek învovement în thîs genre of im-makîng. The government sponsors the productîon of most movîes wîth the requîrement that the scrîpt and the cast be presented to the Mînîstry of Cuture for approva. There îs a ega procedure that dîrectors must go through before gettîng the necessary îcence and permîssîon and theîr productîon must meet these requîrements îf they are to stand a chance of competîon. Amost every im that îs made, încudîng those that woud be consîdered îndependent, are stî reîant on the inancîa and ogîstîc support of government înstîtutîons and organîzatîons, such as the Isamîc Repubîc of Iran Broadcastîng (IRIB); the Farabî Fîm Foundatîon; Kanoon, the Instîtute for the Inteectua Deveopment of Chîdren and Young Aduts (IDCYA); the Documentary and Experîmenta Fîm Centre; and the im sectîon of the Iranîan Revoutîonary Guards. For a im-maker to competey avoîd the machînatîons of and afiîatîon wîth thîs system, they must go underground. In my artîce on underground cînema în Iran, I proie the deveopment of a new trend of guerrîa im-makîng în Iran that has taken shape as a consequence of Iranîan im-makers’ cîvî dîsobedîence and refusa to adhere to the rues dîctated by the Iranîan im authorîtîes. It embraces a body of work that represents a margîn of Iranîan cînema whîch îs beîng made wîthout the requîred authorîzatîon or inancîa and technîca support of the government. In my argument, Iranîan underground ims more cosey resembe the candestîne movîes made durîng the Spanîsh Cîvî War under the Franco dîctatorshîp than the experîmenta ims made by the Amerîcan underground im-makers of the 1960s and 1970s. There îs no argument that îndependent im-makers în Iran have aways been subject to censorshîp and întense pressure from the authorîtîes. The Iranîan government perîodîcay reasserts îts contro by makîng arrests and punîshîng im-makers who have vîoated theîr rues wîth prîson sentences and bans to set an exampe for others. However, underground im-makîng aways manages to persevere to some extent and achîeve recognîtîon for îndependent Iranîan cînema on an înternatîona scae. I pay partîcuar heed to how the process has been democratîzed and underground im-makers greaty emancîpated by current dîgîta technoogy and new medîa, enabîng dîrectors such as Jafar Panahî to more easîy chaenge the hegemonîc forces of the Iranîan state. InIn Fîm Nîst/Thîs Is Not A Fîm(2011), Panahî uses dîgîta cameras and a mobîe phone to bypass the reguatîons on im-makîng. Even though he has been put under house arrest and îs awaîtîng a verdîct on hîs appea of a sîx-year prîson sentence and im ban, he managed to put out a im seen throughout the word. Arguaby the most negected genre în Iranîan im studîes îs anîmatîon, not ony în the West but aso însîde Iran. Despîte îts steady growth în the ast ifteen years, there has been undeservedy îtte academîc attentîon paîd to Iranîan anîmatîon. Therefore, Fatemeh Hosseînî-Shakîb’s artîce on thîs topîc can be regarded as a rare and much needed învestîgatîon of the genre. Startîng în 1958 wîth a mere two-seconds ong anîmatîon (Muah Nasreddîn, by Esfandîar Ahmdîeh), marked the bîrth of thîs movement at the then Mînîstry of Art and Cuture to the present day. Fatemeh shows how the Instîtute for the Inteectua Deveopment of Chîdren and Young Aduts (IDCYA) (shortened to Kanoon) was estabîshed în 1965 by Farah Pahavî, the wîfe of the ate Shah, and measures îts great împact on the deveopment
Introductîon9
  • Univers Univers
  • Ebooks Ebooks
  • Livres audio Livres audio
  • Presse Presse
  • Podcasts Podcasts
  • BD BD
  • Documents Documents